![]() |
|
|
#41 |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 42
|
LOL... I doubt anyone can "win the argument." There's always gonna be contention about which belt means what or has which lineage. It's wrestling. Hell, in boxing, which is supposed to be legit, they have a tough time keeping track of a linear champ so wrestling just gonna be a much bigger clusterfuck. I just think the argument for the titles having the lineages I mentioned is very solid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You can't "see it"?
Let me help:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Posts: 58,598
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
#1 Senior Elite Member
Posts: 7,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually, the only thing that really annoys me is when they start racking WWE Championship reigns and WH Championship reigns together...
For instance, HHH is now considered a 13-time World Champion. However, he's really a 8-time WWE Champion and a 5-time World Heavyweight Champion. It even originally annoyed me with Ric Flair, calling him a 16-time World Champion, where as I have seen him as a 14-time (actually 15-time) NWA/WCW Champion and a 2-time WWE(F) Champion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 38,940
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Doesn't bother me too much, they are all (were all) World Championships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Posts: 58,598
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They could have actually made it a big deal, when Batista won the WWE title for the first time after 4 reigns as World Heavyweight Champion. Instead they fucked up. Orton is not a fucking 5 time WWE Champion
he is a 4 time WWE Champion with one reign as the World Heavyweight Champion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
#1 Senior Elite Member
Posts: 7,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yea, but they aren't the same World Championships. I mean winning either one these days doesn't seem to hold much water, but ranking them together just makes me think less of them then I already did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
CUT THE F'N MUSIC
Posts: 176
|
bring back the winged eagle wwe belt or even the attitude era belt do an angle where the champ says the title has no meaning anymore and that the old title (winged eagle belt or attitude era belt) actually meant something, and that guys like hogan, bret, shawn, or austin, rock, taker, held one of those belts and it used to mean something to be the champ.......
also they should bring back the o.g. tag team belts now that they are "unified" and the original i.c. belt and maybe wcws u.s. title belt.... none of the titles seem to mean shit anymore...... no honor in being the champ these days... |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Posts: 58,598
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The secondary belt on Raw always tends to suffer. I mean the Intercontinental title is back on track after it was drafted to Smackdown.
|
|
|
|