![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
You know that’s right
Posts: 52,766
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Top 25 Big Men in WWE History
http://www.wwe.com/inside/wwefeature...s/top25bigmen/
Good list. The order might be a little off but I think they've got all the necessary pieces. I'll let you guys tear it apart. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
You know that’s right
Posts: 52,766
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Although their qualifications are apparently 6'7 and up or more than 300 lbs.
Hulk Hogan was billed as 6'7 and 303. HMMMMMM |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: 4,839
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LOL at Diesel. Surprised to see Ernie Ladd at 7. I honestly haven't heard much about him.
Khali has no business near any top anything list unless it's top five motherfuckers who look like klingons. Dude has a face only a blind mother could love. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Black Sheep Jew
Posts: 8,859
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LOL @ Khali holding that belt. Looks like he went on WWESHOP.com and bought a child size replica.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Gets Hardcore in the gym
Posts: 4,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
![]() PS Edge and Christian were #1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nash should be #1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
It's High Noon!
Posts: 15,703
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I can't view the list, but please tell me Crash Holly is on this list?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Taller than Adam Cole
Posts: 10,876
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No Spoiler? that's disappointing.
Honestly, my top 5 would have been: 1. Undertaker 2. Andre 3. Vader 4. Bam Bam Bigelow 5. Big Bossman |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,363
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
He was billed as 6'8 and 303. Thouigh down the years the height got downgraded. Big show used to be billed as 7'2 in WWE and 7'5 in wcw. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
As over as Crystal Pepsi
Posts: 21,639
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
HAYSTACKS!!!!!!
![]() About time WWE mentions his name somewhere! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
As over as Crystal Pepsi
Posts: 21,639
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
....I agree with Andre the Giant and The Undertaker being in the top two, but I really believe that it should have been Andre on top of the list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
You know that’s right
Posts: 52,766
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well good thing you didn't make the list because your opinion is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Fuck em' this is The War
Posts: 7,778
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Posts: 1,711
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I knew it was between 'Taker and Andre. Wonder why Big Show was number 3 though. See they phased Hogan out on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's pretty good. I'd probably have put Kane and Diesel a bit higher, but they're in the top 10. I'm also a fan from their generation.
I definitely would have put Rikishi higher. He's behind a lot of guys he's miles better than in the ring, and was WAY more over than. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
... Bank
Posts: 3,494
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't even think of the Undertaker as a "giant". In that retrospect, I would have had Andre #1, Big Show #2, and Vader #3. Also, LOL at Viscera being ranked above Mike Awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
~Stay thirsty my friends~
Posts: 102
|
Why is Viscera or the Great Khali even on that list. They are just huge and that is it. I would have done the list like this.
1. Undertaker 2. Andre 3. Kevin Nash 4. Big Show 5. Kane |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Just a bro.
Posts: 3,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Posts: 648
![]()
|
I would have put Andre at #1 for sure. He was the biggest star out of all of those guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Hazardous to Your Health
Posts: 21,730
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Former Intercontinental Champion A-Train was a huge oversight. Definite #17 material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Narc stole my star
Posts: 6,110
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No Lesnar or Goldberg?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
... Bank
Posts: 3,494
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hazardous to Your Health
Posts: 21,730
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The only things really big about Goldberg was his WCW push, and as a result of it his ego.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Posts: 3,755
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I liked that Umaga made the list. Probably the greatest big man they had on the roster at the time. He could work with absolutely anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Ninja Mod, Esquire
Posts: 12,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No Lesnar, and Mike Awesome is WAY to low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Any list where Bruise r Bordy is 17 is shit, though I dont think of him as a big man.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Just a bro.
Posts: 3,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Just a bro.
Posts: 3,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
100% agree with this. Taker has passed Andre. Not sure how Andre would be greater for any reason other than maybe the WM 3 match but all of Taker's accomplishments should out weigh that by now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wow, I am surprised Gorilla made top 5, though he gets the WWE Skew and I wont talk him down as he is a fucking great legend
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Its close guys. Andre was hands down the 1st or biggest star in an up era.
taker has never been THE single guyin a shit era with Swagger as champ. But taker is also far better in the ring than Andre ever was....so maybe a push? |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Just a bro.
Posts: 3,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know much about the 80s but how much bigger than Savage was Andre? Like if Hogan = Austin and Andre = The Rock.... who would be Savage's equivalent in the Attitude Era?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
...Pierre
Posts: 1,093
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Taker is #1 in my opinion also. He may not have ever been the "face" of the company, but he's been a star for close to 20 years and has always been the "staple" in WWE that always drew interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Just a bro.
Posts: 3,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In Taker's defense, I don't think his gimmick would allow him to be THE face of the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
You know that’s right
Posts: 52,766
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
You had territories plus ages in this one. Like Hogan came in at Andres peak, so Andre isnt a fair equal to Hulk and Mach So like Austin = Hogan Rock = Savage Flair= Andre |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Posts: 648
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe the WWE has convinced you that he was a bigger star than he really was? Or maybe you just underappreciate The Undertaker because he's been around and well known for so long?
Or maybe it's hard for you to have any clue at all since you were never around to get a grasp of Andre's real stardom? |
|
|
|