12-18-2003, 07:10 AM | #1 |
Posts: 117
|
NWATNA TV deal
At this point, it seems like that TNA will buy a weekly timeslot on WGN for
an estimated $50,000 a week. The plan is to begin airing their weekly WGN show in mid-January. This is a huge risk for TNA which by all indications is losing money right now. It is estimated that they are doing between 8,200 and 12,500 buys per week. TNA pockets about $4.20 of the $9.95 PPV price, resulting in roughly $43,000 per week. The cost of running a TNA PPV is roughly $85,000 per week. They also make about $5,000 from their gate, but obviously they are in the red. However, the general feeling is that for TNA to ever become a success, it will need to have free TV to stimulate weekly PPV buys. The discussed timeslot right now is 10AM ET on Saturday mornings, which would be horrible for them. WGN is also not proven as a national network like other channels of its kind are (TBS). WGN does air nationally for the most part, but does not promote nationally, thus making it a glorified Chicago channel. TNA is hoping that they will be able to do a good rating on WGN which would put them in a position to get a better TV deal. Of course, they could lose a significant portion of their money on this risk. The plan is to do an upgraded Xplosion show for WGN. The show would be similar to the current Xplosion but feature one main event level match. Credit: Wrestling Observer Newsletter |
12-18-2003, 07:29 AM | #2 |
TPWW's OFFICIAL SNAKE
Posts: 6,968
|
Oh well they'll be skint sooner than i thought, shame but if they take that deal they want shooting.
|
12-18-2003, 07:45 AM | #3 |
TPWW's Glass Ceiling
Posts: 5,793
|
If it ain't broke,don't try to fix it...I think that while TNA may be losing
money right now,this could be a venture that could bankrupt them.The PPV format is losing money,but if they did a little creative booking,and spent the money they plan on using for the WGN deal on some good PR and placement of stars in every media outlet possible,it could definitely help them I hope whatever choice they decide to make that it works out,because while the booking is getting shabby,they provide a nice alternative,and have some great talents (AJ Styles,David Young,Jarrett,Watts,Legend, Daniels,etc..). |
12-18-2003, 11:40 AM | #4 |
I Hate Bottles
Posts: 4,362
|
I'd watch it on WGN if they could a better time slot. Saturday morning just usually isn't when I'm in the mood for wrestling (or being awake).
|
12-18-2003, 11:43 AM | #5 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
|
|
12-18-2003, 01:14 PM | #6 | |
Part time poster
Posts: 22,963
|
Quote:
And when you start paying for TV, you dig yourself a hole you can't get out of. |
|
12-18-2003, 01:38 PM | #7 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
|
|
12-18-2003, 04:02 PM | #8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
argh, legend is terrible
|
12-18-2003, 04:17 PM | #9 |
brothas gonna work it out
Posts: 2,446
|
I saw Legend wrestle back in July when I saw a bit of it at a friends camp. Legend was actually good. He didn't display much tonight, for me to decide whether he was good or not.
|
12-18-2003, 04:23 PM | #10 |
Only Sane Person Here
Posts: 17,983
|
WGN? WTF is that? Never heard of it.
Also, 10 AM is ass and nobody will be awake that early. |
12-19-2003, 02:22 AM | #11 |
Posts: 18,357
|
Well, it's do or die. If they don't get this, they'll never be more than a cult hit. This is a huge risk, but it affords them the POSSIBILITY of success, and I wish them the best of luck.
Funny enough, I get WGN at my dorm but not TNN. Go figure. |
12-19-2003, 02:53 AM | #12 |
TPWW VET
Posts: 10,837
|
WGN is (I'm guessing) a station based out of Chicago (which, strangely I get here in Vegas ) The only reason I say that is because every damn time i flip through it, there is always the bulls, or blackhawks or cubs playing on that channel.
|
12-19-2003, 04:01 AM | #13 |
TPWW VET
Posts: 10,837
|
Now, my personal opinion. Very bad move. I don't know if they are a big enough company or not yet, but I just don't think they have drawn enough interest. Plus, Saturday's at 10 in the morning? Not going to work. And can they afford $50k a week? But looking at it, that was really the only offer they had, and I guess they took it. All or nothing is correct.
|
12-19-2003, 07:35 AM | #14 |
You Sunk My Battleship
Posts: 32
|
We get WGN here in the middle of South Central Pennsylvania. I watch it a lot, because they always have Chicago sports on. They also air a lot of the same programming during the evening that TBS does. They aren't quite a national station, especially since at 9 PM CT they air local news for Chicago.
|
12-22-2003, 04:01 PM | #15 |
*Oh Sh*t*
Posts: 19,302
|
well it looks like I'll be up watchin tv at 10 in the mornin to catch TNA next year.
|
12-22-2003, 04:08 PM | #16 |
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,374
|
TNA would be well off going against Heat or something I think. Or Raw, they could probably score around the 2's.
|
12-22-2003, 05:23 PM | #17 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
|
Saturday morning wrestling was cool when I was 7.
|
12-22-2003, 05:26 PM | #18 | |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2003, 05:28 PM | #19 |
Fthagn?
Posts: 10,042
|
I get that station
|
12-22-2003, 05:32 PM | #20 | |
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2003, 06:22 PM | #21 |
thebitch is back
Posts: 174
|
Well, the 50K a week will hurt them for a while, but they need to get rid of the weekly PPV format. If they do one monthly PPV, and use this TV timeslot to build up thier events, I think they'd make more money.
Not to mention, this TV timeslot will cost them 50K-advertising. They get paid to have somebody advertise during thier show. |