05-27-2011, 01:59 PM | #1 |
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 2,957
|
if you were a wrestler...
which company would you work for ?
a) TNA (present day) b) WCW (2000) bear in mind that you dont know that WCW will be history in a years time. shoot interviews for free : http://forums.projectcovo.com/showthread.php?t=1562931 Another quality shitty thread by The MAC |
05-27-2011, 02:01 PM | #2 |
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
|
OCW
|
05-27-2011, 02:04 PM | #3 |
Posts: 3,743
|
WCW for sure and i'd rather be making dough as a jobber there than a main eventer in TNA anyday.
Last edited by XCaliber; 05-27-2011 at 02:22 PM. |
05-27-2011, 02:06 PM | #4 |
In The Shadows
Posts: 140
|
Aren't they the same???
|
05-27-2011, 02:10 PM | #5 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,815
|
WCW for sure. It would pretty much guarantee me a job with TNA anyways years down the line.
|
05-27-2011, 02:16 PM | #6 |
Samurai Rocker
Posts: 2,876
|
WCW, and I would not transfer my contract to Vince.
|
05-27-2011, 02:31 PM | #7 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
|
Quit
|
05-27-2011, 02:33 PM | #8 |
You know that’s right
Posts: 52,684
|
I'd work for any company in 2000 over working for one now. It'd be nice to wrestle in front of fans who enjoyed watching the show and weren't entitled pieces of shit.
|
05-27-2011, 02:48 PM | #9 |
Hazardous to Your Health
Posts: 21,730
|
OCW
|
05-27-2011, 02:59 PM | #10 |
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
|
|
05-27-2011, 03:14 PM | #11 |
King K Cool
Posts: 28,472
|
Wrestlicious....
|
05-27-2011, 03:20 PM | #12 |
it's really real meat
Posts: 7,366
|
whichever one paid me more and gave me the best contract
|
05-27-2011, 03:22 PM | #13 |
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 2,957
|
yes people say that but then when they not getting other sorts of stimulation they bitch and moan
|
05-27-2011, 03:25 PM | #14 |
Needs an avatar
Posts: 301
|
Dubya-See-Dubya everytime. I never watched it, I never particularly liked it, but anything's better than TNA, right?
|
05-27-2011, 03:29 PM | #15 |
Ninja Mod, Esquire
Posts: 12,676
|
Depends. If I went to WCW, am I just starting off? Am I a known midcarder, main eventer, etc?
|
05-27-2011, 03:49 PM | #16 |
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 2,957
|
even if you were a main eventer from another company it wont mean shit in wcw
|
05-27-2011, 04:06 PM | #17 |
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,374
|
WCW, because most of those guys ended up in TNA anyway so I'd have a head start and I would know Borash, Jarrett, and Russo.
|
05-27-2011, 04:51 PM | #18 |
I'm a loner, Dottie...
Posts: 3,069
|
|
05-27-2011, 04:56 PM | #19 |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
|
|
05-27-2011, 04:57 PM | #20 |
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
|
|
05-27-2011, 04:59 PM | #21 |
Posts: 1,711
|
WCW.....a guaranteed contract...even if i do fck all.
|
05-27-2011, 05:57 PM | #22 |
Grim Fandango
Posts: 5,192
|
WCW and I would be David Arquette.
|
05-27-2011, 05:58 PM | #23 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,946
|
I don't fucking know. Jesus.
|
05-27-2011, 06:37 PM | #24 |
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,374
|
|
05-29-2011, 02:14 AM | #25 |
Second coming
Posts: 7
|
Shit I don't think I could bear being in either company, might as well be a nobody in ROH
|
05-29-2011, 05:53 AM | #26 |
Posts: 726
|
Personally, I'd choose the current TNA product. I know it may not be the best time in TNA history but currently I am liking their product better than most things in WWE. There are alot of things I do like about WWE but I am enjoying TNA for the most part: Angle-Jarrett, the Knockouts division, Fortune, The Network vs. Immortal, Kendrick as the voice of the X-Division are just a few things I'm liking. I've been liking TNA better the last month or so, though I felt Extreme Rules was the best PPV this year thus far. I'd probably be more financially secure in WCW circa 2000 or WWE, but I feel the TNA roster just enjoys what they do. They have fun with the product. WWE does as well and there's many passionate individuals, but there seems to be more freedom in TNA.
|
05-29-2011, 05:55 AM | #27 |
Posts: 726
|
|
05-29-2011, 08:08 AM | #28 |
Don't believe the hype
Posts: 640
|
WCW, just so I could be around Alex Wright.
|
05-29-2011, 11:29 AM | #29 | |
The Champ
Posts: 700
|
Quote:
You fuckers make me sick. Not only would you get on your knees and suck a cock to be in any one of the companies, you must act like sheep and say shit like this. Grow a pair you cunts. |
|
05-29-2011, 11:35 AM | #30 |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
|
SaskatchewanChamp will not stand for the besmirching of TNA or WCW circa 2000.
|
05-29-2011, 01:39 PM | #31 |
OLD SCHOOL FAN
Posts: 13,946
|
|
05-29-2011, 03:16 PM | #32 |
RAPTURE READY.
Posts: 31,936
|
TNA, because I'd relocate to Florida and travelling on the road wouldn't be a major issue
|
05-29-2011, 06:31 PM | #33 |
Samurai Rocker
Posts: 2,876
|
And after WCW gets bought out by WWF, I would not transfer my contract to Vince. I'd let it run out, before making my next move, since at that time, there were no alternatives.
|
05-29-2011, 06:47 PM | #34 |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
|
Because naturally you would have Steiner/Goldberg/Nash status as opposed to being one of the many contracts that came over as part of the actual sale.
|
05-30-2011, 12:25 AM | #35 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,135
|
I'll take WCW. When it folds a year when down the line I'd likely be picked up by WWF/E where I would at least get a slight chance to shine and earn myself a push leading to longterm employment.
If I were to be let go by WWE at any point there after I culd just walk into to TNA anyways. |
05-30-2011, 12:30 AM | #36 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,815
|
I like how a lot of people are referencing getting picked up by the WWE in a year as a part of the choice to go WCW, when it was clearly stated that you don't know that it is going to be closing in a year.
|