"World" Title(s)?

**BigCrippyZ** · 04-21-2012, 01:20 AM

It does seem like that they're pushing the WWE title as the "World" title as of late, and RAW definitely feels like the "A" show for the last several years, at least in terms of promotion, stars, etc.

I'm not trying to bring up all of the reasons, flaws, debates, complaints or arguments about WWE's writing, storylines, etc., in the past few years. That being said, I'm honestly curious about what you guys think about the "world" title situation.

I understand that things have changed since the purchase of WCW, "Invasion", etc. However, what do most of the "hardcore" wrestling fans think? Do you guys feel that there should OR needs to be only one "World" title, regardless of whether or not it's defended on both shows, etc.?

Feel free to discuss or ellaborate...

View Poll Results: Should WWE only have one "World" title?
Yes, 1 "World" title only	20	68.97%
No, I prefer the 2 titles, the WWE and WHC	8	27.59%
I think there should be multiple (3+) "World" titles	1	3.45%
Voters: 29. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

04-21-2012, 01:20 AM	#1
BigCrippyZ Posts: 3,033	"World" Title(s)? It does seem like that they're pushing the WWE title as the "World" title as of late, and RAW definitely feels like the "A" show for the last several years, at least in terms of promotion, stars, etc. I'm not trying to bring up all of the reasons, flaws, debates, complaints or arguments about WWE's writing, storylines, etc., in the past few years. That being said, I'm honestly curious about what you guys think about the "world" title situation. I understand that things have changed since the purchase of WCW, "Invasion", etc. However, what do most of the "hardcore" wrestling fans think? Do you guys feel that there should OR needs to be only one "World" title, regardless of whether or not it's defended on both shows, etc.? Feel free to discuss or ellaborate...