![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: 61,523
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm kind of thinking the WWE could put the WWE Title on John Cena at Survivor Series
I know a lot of people won't like that idea, but I'm starting to think that it might be the right move for the WWE to make heading into 2013. CM Punk is a fantastic performer, but I think he's done about as much as he is going to do in this reign as WWE Champion. Now it feels like they are keeping the WWE Title on him just for the sake of keeping it on him.
CM Punk is a heel. It's his job to put the faces over, so that the faces can make a lot of money. While Punk vs. Rock might be an IWC dream match, of sorts, is Cena vs. Rock II the bigger deal? A lot of people think that it will happen at WrestleMania XXIX, but I just can't see that going down. It's a case of "been there, done that" as far as "biggest attractions of the night" go. Cena vs. Rock as a Royal Rumble WWE Title match, though? Now that would be absolutely huge. Punk's character would also be quite intriguing without the WWE Title. Your average fan would be absolutely rabid to heckle him if he came out dethroned. We would get an absolutely possessed CM Punk chasing the belt back. Punk would also be a very strong pick for Royal Rumble Winner, which is something that could really add credibility to his persona seeking respect -- especially if he enters the Rumble from quite a low number. Is keeping the WWE Title on CM Punk through Survivor Series and TLC just the WWE spinning its wheels? |
![]() |
![]() |