DISCUSSION - Would Smackdown being converted into a 'speciality' show be a wise move?

**Heyman** · 11-01-2016, 03:25 PM

DISCUSSION - Would Smackdown being converted into a 'speciality' show be a wise move?

In the future, I'm wondering if it would be in the WWE's best interests to have one of the shows (Smackdown being the likely candidate) be a speciality show.

What I mean by that is this: Have every single.....

1) Female wrestler
2) Cruiserweight
3) Hoss (for faggots like Jim Ross with a big man penis fetish, lollllz)

etc., be a part of Smackdown. Have entire speciality divisions on that one show. Hell, you can even bring back a Hardcore division and put it on Smackdown.

You can then devote RAW to

1) WWE/World title division (The title becomes unified, if it hasn't been already....I haven't watched programming in years and so I have no idea if it has or not).

2) US/IC title division (again, re-unite the belts if it hasn't been united already).

3) Tag team division:

Many of you might say, "Well, if the World/WWE title is only on RAW, then doesn't that make Smackdown look inferior?" Normally, it would, but it seems like the WWE are trying to position the Women's title as being equally prestigious to the World/WWE title and so why not go with that?

All in all, I'm just wondering if each show should be stacked with entire divisions? (as opposed to having a diversified 'melting pot' on both shows). I feel like if you give each show distinct divisions, then you not only achieve some brand identity, but you help attract different segments and demographics to different shows.

11-01-2016, 03:25 PM	#1
Heyman Father of Hinduship Posts: 21,083	DISCUSSION - Would Smackdown being converted into a 'speciality' show be a wise move? DISCUSSION - Would Smackdown being converted into a 'speciality' show be a wise move? In the future, I'm wondering if it would be in the WWE's best interests to have one of the shows (Smackdown being the likely candidate) be a speciality show. What I mean by that is this: Have every single..... 1) Female wrestler 2) Cruiserweight 3) Hoss (for faggots like Jim Ross with a big man penis fetish, lollllz) etc., be a part of Smackdown. Have entire speciality divisions on that one show. Hell, you can even bring back a Hardcore division and put it on Smackdown. You can then devote RAW to 1) WWE/World title division (The title becomes unified, if it hasn't been already....I haven't watched programming in years and so I have no idea if it has or not). 2) US/IC title division (again, re-unite the belts if it hasn't been united already). 3) Tag team division: Many of you might say, "Well, if the World/WWE title is only on RAW, then doesn't that make Smackdown look inferior?" Normally, it would, but it seems like the WWE are trying to position the Women's title as being equally prestigious to the World/WWE title and so why not go with that? All in all, I'm just wondering if each show should be stacked with entire divisions? (as opposed to having a diversified 'melting pot' on both shows). I feel like if you give each show distinct divisions, then you not only achieve some brand identity, but you help attract different segments and demographics to different shows.