![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
GG Ottawa
Hasek. That is all.
|
![]() |
#2 |
adjective noun
Posts: 30,417
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lecavalier.
That is all. Dun KS lad |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No no, this has nothing to do with Calgary or Tampa. Let's rejoice and laugh at both Ottawa and Dominik Hasek. You will feel much better afterwards. I did. <3
|
![]() |
#4 |
Unofficial Legend
Posts: 11,931
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
dun shoot
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hasek is a head case, but if he stays focused he could be a huge asset to the Senators chances of winning/being a true cup contender.
|
![]() |
#6 |
Crows Before Hoes
Posts: 24,501
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() They could have just gone for Weekes ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
A.W.O.L.
Posts: 5,862
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I do believe they're are better choices available. By better I guess I mean stabler. Hasek is such an enigma, not something Ottawa should be gambling on at this critical time in their teams developments.
They'll either look like idiots for going after him and failing, or geniuses for plucking him and winning. Not much room for middle ground IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Adrenaline Machine
Posts: 23
![]() |
Hasek has fallen down ever since the 99 Cup Finals. He won the Cup in 02 but still he has fallen from what he was in 99
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
OutrageousOlympicEntrance
Posts: 12,420
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah I don't think Hasek was a smart move.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It cant hurt, they weren't going to win with Lalime or Emery or Prusek in the next 2 or 3 years, so why not take a shot with someone who was the best goalie in the world for many years?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
The People's Member
Posts: 18,092
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I liked Lalime, but meh.
Anyway, nice to see you again RDD |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Posts: 18,763
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() i'm not really a big fan of hasek but i don't think they're any worse off having hasek instead of lalime, plus he's got more upside. i think last year was just sort of an off year with hasek and i think he'll have something to prove and play for this year, without the added distraction of last years three ring goalie circus in detroit. bit of a gamble but one worth taking i think. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Dirty Sanchez Below
Posts: 16,149
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Prusek isn't a bad goalie either and probably would have taken over for Lalime at some point this year, so it's not a bad move in my books.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Painkiller
Posts: 1,124
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I loved Lalime in Ottawa, he was probably my favorite goalie the last few seasons. I've liked him ever since his rookie days with the Pens when he was amazing.
I've never really been a Hasek fan, so that combined with the firing of my Memorial Cup winning coach Martin has made me less of an Ottawa fan. ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
The Franchise
Posts: 7,368
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I doubt he ever plays for them.
It's a one year deal, the CBA is gonna stop the season, and Hasek is what? 53 |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Dirty Sanchez Below
Posts: 16,149
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yash swoops in with some humor
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Crows Before Hoes
Posts: 24,501
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If there's only half a season, maybe the Ducks can win the cup.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
A.W.O.L.
Posts: 5,862
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Where did Lalime end of again?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
VALENTÍA
Posts: 11,988
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
St. Louis Blues.
![]() and they Traded Bonk to the Kings, then to the Canadiens. ![]() |
![]() |