DISCUSSION - Should Triple H face Shawn Micahels for the WWE title at Wrestlemania?

**Heyman** · 12-30-2003, 04:10 AM

CAUTION - the following may contain Raw Spoilers from December 29, 2003. Reader discretion is advised

DISCUSSION - Should Triple H face Shawn Micahels for the WWE title at Wrestlemania?

Personally - I found the match between HBK and HHH to be quite good tonight. HBK did an excellent job in carrying the match. However - it got me thinking.......should these two re-kindle their rivalry and face one another at Wrestlemania?.......for the title?

At Royal Rumble, I think Triple H and HBK should have a rematch. Another hard fought battle occurs, but Triple H wins via screwjob in the end (Batista interference?). A few nights later, HBK gets some measure of revenge by cleanly defeating Batista. He then re-focuses his attention towards Triple H. The two continue to build their rivalry leading to a title match at Wrestlemania.

In the end, Shawn Michaels cleanly defeats Triple H and wins the title. Shawn Michaels retires WITH the WWE title the very next night (which then causes the WWE to have ONE world champion......who appears on both shows....for the company).

Here is why I like the idea of HBK and Triple H feuding for the title at Mania

1)HBK is probably the only guy who can get a great match out of Triple H now.

2)HBK is probably the only guy that Triple H would be willing to put over cleanly

3)Shawn Michaels can literally retire "on top" a la John Elway style by winning the title at Mania. For a guy who's had to put over many guys at Mania' throughout his career (HBK actually has a losing record at Mania' if I'm not mistaken), this would be the perfect send off for arguably the greatest wrestler of all-time.

4)Shawn Michaels and Triple H already have a HUGE history with one another. The WWE can hype the shit out of this. They can talk about EVERYTHING.....from when HHH and HBK were fellow degenerates, to present day.

After Triple H jobs to Shawn Michaels, Triple H can then become a part-time wrestler himself (hope to god).........and focus more on movies or 'full-time booking'.

What happens with Goldberg?

So - what happens with Bill Goldberg? I say move him to Smackdown. Smackdown is in need of star power. That's where Goldberg comes in. The WWE can easily 'play it off' as Goldberg's contract expired and as result, has defected to Smackdown.

As I mentioned in my other thread, Smackdown has more jobbers and 'less established' wrestlers than RAw. Therefore, the WWE can freely push Goldberg like he was in WCW. The WWE can also build Smackdown around the "inevitable" Goldberg vs. Lesnar match at Wrestlemania.....for the Smackdown WWE title.

As I mentioned in the other thread, moving Goldberg is advantageous in a lot of ways.

-Gives SD much needed star power
-Avoids potential friction between Goldberg/Triple H&HBK.......since Triple H and HBK play a part in booking now.
-Gives the fans what they want in terms of a potential Lesnar/Goldberg match
-Allows a greater chance in seeing the likes of RVD and Jericho being pushed as main-event faces in the future.

Wrestlemania 20 matches (some matches I wouldn't mind seeing)

WWE title - Brock Lesnar vs. Bill Goldberg

World title - Triple H vs. Shawn Michaels

Mick Foley, The Rock, Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. Randy Orton, Dave Batista, Ric Flair (street fight)

Undertaker vs. Kane

Kurt Angle vs. Chris Benoit.

Chris Jericho vs. Christian

[b]Speaking of Kurt Angle, I'd like to see him turn heel again when he comes back (jealousy of Goldberg 'taking his spot'?). [b]Angle reforms Team Angle, and feuds with Benoit (Benoit goes over at Mania).

Angle is also far more entertaining as a heel IMO.

12-30-2003, 04:10 AM	#1
Heyman Father of Hinduship Posts: 21,083	DISCUSSION - Should Triple H face Shawn Micahels for the WWE title at Wrestlemania? CAUTION - the following may contain Raw Spoilers from December 29, 2003. Reader discretion is advised DISCUSSION - Should Triple H face Shawn Micahels for the WWE title at Wrestlemania? Personally - I found the match between HBK and HHH to be quite good tonight. HBK did an excellent job in carrying the match. However - it got me thinking.......should these two re-kindle their rivalry and face one another at Wrestlemania?.......for the title? At Royal Rumble, I think Triple H and HBK should have a rematch. Another hard fought battle occurs, but Triple H wins via screwjob in the end (Batista interference?). A few nights later, HBK gets some measure of revenge by cleanly defeating Batista. He then re-focuses his attention towards Triple H. The two continue to build their rivalry leading to a title match at Wrestlemania. In the end, Shawn Michaels cleanly defeats Triple H and wins the title. Shawn Michaels retires WITH the WWE title the very next night (which then causes the WWE to have ONE world champion......who appears on both shows....for the company). Here is why I like the idea of HBK and Triple H feuding for the title at Mania 1)HBK is probably the only guy who can get a great match out of Triple H now. 2)HBK is probably the only guy that Triple H would be willing to put over cleanly 3)Shawn Michaels can literally retire "on top" a la John Elway style by winning the title at Mania. For a guy who's had to put over many guys at Mania' throughout his career (HBK actually has a losing record at Mania' if I'm not mistaken), this would be the perfect send off for arguably the greatest wrestler of all-time. 4)Shawn Michaels and Triple H already have a HUGE history with one another. The WWE can hype the shit out of this. They can talk about EVERYTHING.....from when HHH and HBK were fellow degenerates, to present day. After Triple H jobs to Shawn Michaels, Triple H can then become a part-time wrestler himself (hope to god).........and focus more on movies or 'full-time booking'. What happens with Goldberg? So - what happens with Bill Goldberg? I say move him to Smackdown. Smackdown is in need of star power. That's where Goldberg comes in. The WWE can easily 'play it off' as Goldberg's contract expired and as result, has defected to Smackdown. As I mentioned in my other thread, Smackdown has more jobbers and 'less established' wrestlers than RAw. Therefore, the WWE can freely push Goldberg like he was in WCW. The WWE can also build Smackdown around the "inevitable" Goldberg vs. Lesnar match at Wrestlemania.....for the Smackdown WWE title. As I mentioned in the other thread, moving Goldberg is advantageous in a lot of ways. -Gives SD much needed star power -Avoids potential friction between Goldberg/Triple H&HBK.......since Triple H and HBK play a part in booking now. -Gives the fans what they want in terms of a potential Lesnar/Goldberg match -Allows a greater chance in seeing the likes of RVD and Jericho being pushed as main-event faces in the future. Wrestlemania 20 matches (some matches I wouldn't mind seeing) WWE title - Brock Lesnar vs. Bill Goldberg World title - Triple H vs. Shawn Michaels Mick Foley, The Rock, Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. Randy Orton, Dave Batista, Ric Flair (street fight) Undertaker vs. Kane Kurt Angle vs. Chris Benoit. Chris Jericho vs. Christian [b]Speaking of Kurt Angle, I'd like to see him turn heel again when he comes back (jealousy of Goldberg 'taking his spot'?). [b]Angle reforms Team Angle, and feuds with Benoit (Benoit goes over at Mania). Angle is also far more entertaining as a heel IMO.