I don't want to say Michael Vick is over-rated, but

[road doggy dogg]

C'mon. Like he's good and all, but every sports analyst everywhere is riding his cock like he's the Jesus Christ of the NFL. He had one good season, and everybody is talking about how he's done so much for Atlanta and he is the only reason they are a good team etc etc. Bullshit. I don't know, he adds a huge deal of excitement to games, but I don't think he's revolutionizing the game or anything. People are making it sound like he's been the best QB over the past 10 years, and all he's done has gotten the team to one playoff. Last year I'm not holding against him at all because he was injured, can't really blame him for that. But other than his 2002 season, what has he done? He's playing awful this year, and people are saying that he's slumping, and he'll be back on form in due time. How do you know that?! He hasn't shown anything to be slumping FROM, other than one good season. I guarantee that in 3-4 weeks (or hell even this week since they play the Lions), Vick will have a solid game and people will be saying how "Vick's back" and all that. Back to what though? Being an average quarterback (not saying he's bad by any means, but he's no Manning or Favre) who can run because defenses don't key on him? I don't know, I'm just not seeing him as the gamebreaker that all the media dubs him as. Maybe I'm just not watching enough Falcons games or something.