#2

**SuperSlim** · 12-07-2004, 09:58 AM

Just out of curiosity who do you believe should have been the real #2 ranked team to face off against USC in the national championship?

I believe Auburn was shafted.

**Splaya** · 12-07-2004, 10:01 AM

Auburn without a shadow of a doubt, but you forgot to add Utah to this list. They were definitely in the same boat that Auburn was/is in.

**SuperSlim** · 12-07-2004, 10:01 AM

more than just Utah... the BCS has screwed up big time this season

**Splaya** · 12-07-2004, 10:04 AM

We say that everytime around this time of year though, ever since the system was put into the league. They need to get rid of it and have the polls decide.

**Supreme Olajuwon** · 12-07-2004, 11:20 AM

You guys act like Oklahoma didn't steamroll pretty much everyone they played. Yes Auburn is deserving, but what exactly has Oklahoma done to lose their spot in the game?

**SuperSlim** · 12-07-2004, 02:11 PM

Oklahoma is really overrated. I mean Auburn really dominated this season. It's like they have one game when it was getting a lil close against Tennessee for the SEC championship and so they get tossed to the number three slot while Oklahoma faces off mainly against teams not deemed as a threat and rip them to shreds.

They really do need to get rid of the BCS cause it is flawed in so many areas.

**el fregadero** · 12-07-2004, 02:13 PM

I would put rather see Auburn in the title game, but I don't have much of a problem with Oklahoma being there.

**The Outlaw** · 12-07-2004, 02:56 PM

Oklahoma #1
Auburn #2
USC #3

Thats right

**The Outlaw** · 12-07-2004, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperSlim

Oklahoma is really overrated. I mean Auburn really dominated this season. It's like they have one game when it was getting a lil close against Tennessee for the SEC championship and so they get tossed to the number three slot while Oklahoma faces off mainly against teams not deemed as a threat and rip them to shreds.

They really do need to get rid of the BCS cause it is flawed in so many areas.

Did you watch them play 6-5 Crimson Tide?

6-0 Bama at halftime
21-13 final

**Supreme Olajuwon** · 12-07-2004, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperSlim

Oklahoma is really overrated. I mean Auburn really dominated this season. It's like they have one game when it was getting a lil close against Tennessee for the SEC championship and so they get tossed to the number three slot while Oklahoma faces off mainly against teams not deemed as a threat and rip them to shreds.

They really do need to get rid of the BCS cause it is flawed in so many areas.

Texas isn't a threat?

BTW let's look at schedules here. Oklahoma scheduled games against Bowling Green and Oregon who both usually field good teams year in and year out. Auburn schedules games against Louisana Monroe and The Citadel. The Citadel isn't even a D 1-A school

Auburn really doesn't have anyone to blame but themselves

**The Outlaw** · 12-07-2004, 03:14 PM

Oklahoma's opponents:

7-5
3-8
7-4
3-8
10-1
7-4
8-3
4-7
4-7
5-6
5-6
7-4

Total record of 70-63

Auburn's opponents:
9-3
9-3
6-5
6-6
5-6
9-2
4-7
2-9
3-7
9-2
3-8
5-6

Total record of 70-64

USC's opponents:
10-2
10-1
5-6
6-5
1-10
8-3
6-5
6-5
3-8
5-6
4-7
4-7

Total record of 68-65

Now, do I think Auburn deserves to be in it? Yes. Do I believe Oklahoma should be booted? No. In my honest opinion, USC should be booted

But, Auburn does not have anyone to blame except their douche bag coach. He schedules...The Citadel and Louisiana Monroe? Lets get serious here Tommy. Had he scheduled ONE good non conference team, we might not be talking this way.

Then again, the media and the coaches are on USC's cocks so it probably wouldn't matter.

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 12-07-2004, 03:27 PM

It doesn't really matter. All 3 teams are equally nasty. I think if Auburn started out the year as #2 they'd be going to the bowl game, not Oklahoma. Oklahoma never really did anything to prove that it SHOULDNT be #2, and neither did USC. Media is all over USC's cock because do you remember what happened last year? After being snubbed just like Auburn is this year, they kept it together, romped Michigan in their bowl game. And have been on a winning streak ever since.

**BCWWF** · 12-07-2004, 06:18 PM

This is a shitty situation because all three of these teams are good and stuff, but only two could play for the national championship and really I don't see how you can say one of the two they chose wasn't deserving.

This just helps make the case for a playoff system, thats how it should have been and there wouldn't be this drama.

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 12-07-2004, 07:07 PM

Yeah there should be a playoff, but they NCAA is all about the $$$

View Poll Results: Who should be #2
Oklahoma	2	25.00%
Auburn	6	75.00%
Voters: 8. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

12-07-2004, 10:01 AM	#2
Splaya 1-0 TPWW Chess Master Posts: 17,212	Auburn without a shadow of a doubt, but you forgot to add Utah to this list. They were definitely in the same boat that Auburn was/is in.

12-07-2004, 10:01 AM	#3
SuperSlim Oh Sht* Posts: 19,302	more than just Utah... the BCS has screwed up big time this season

12-07-2004, 10:04 AM	#4
Splaya 1-0 TPWW Chess Master Posts: 17,212	We say that everytime around this time of year though, ever since the system was put into the league. They need to get rid of it and have the polls decide.

12-07-2004, 11:20 AM	#5
Supreme Olajuwon You know that�s right Posts: 52,765	You guys act like Oklahoma didn't steamroll pretty much everyone they played. Yes Auburn is deserving, but what exactly has Oklahoma done to lose their spot in the game?

12-07-2004, 02:11 PM	#6
SuperSlim Oh Sht* Posts: 19,302	Oklahoma is really overrated. I mean Auburn really dominated this season. It's like they have one game when it was getting a lil close against Tennessee for the SEC championship and so they get tossed to the number three slot while Oklahoma faces off mainly against teams not deemed as a threat and rip them to shreds. They really do need to get rid of the BCS cause it is flawed in so many areas.

12-07-2004, 02:13 PM	#7
el fregadero Tap-In Posts: 20,300	I would put rather see Auburn in the title game, but I don't have much of a problem with Oklahoma being there.

12-07-2004, 02:56 PM	#8
The Outlaw Unofficial Legend Posts: 11,931	Oklahoma #1 Auburn #2 USC #3 Thats right

12-07-2004, 03:14 PM	#11
The Outlaw Unofficial Legend Posts: 11,931	Oklahoma's opponents: 7-5 3-8 7-4 3-8 10-1 7-4 8-3 4-7 4-7 5-6 5-6 7-4 Total record of 70-63 Auburn's opponents: 9-3 9-3 6-5 6-6 5-6 9-2 4-7 2-9 3-7 9-2 3-8 5-6 Total record of 70-64 USC's opponents: 10-2 10-1 5-6 6-5 1-10 8-3 6-5 6-5 3-8 5-6 4-7 4-7 Total record of 68-65 Now, do I think Auburn deserves to be in it? Yes. Do I believe Oklahoma should be booted? No. In my honest opinion, USC should be booted But, Auburn does not have anyone to blame except their douche bag coach. He schedules...The Citadel and Louisiana Monroe? Lets get serious here Tommy. Had he scheduled ONE good non conference team, we might not be talking this way. Then again, the media and the coaches are on USC's cocks so it probably wouldn't matter.

12-07-2004, 03:27 PM	#12
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	It doesn't really matter. All 3 teams are equally nasty. I think if Auburn started out the year as #2 they'd be going to the bowl game, not Oklahoma. Oklahoma never really did anything to prove that it SHOULDNT be #2, and neither did USC. Media is all over USC's cock because do you remember what happened last year? After being snubbed just like Auburn is this year, they kept it together, romped Michigan in their bowl game. And have been on a winning streak ever since.

12-07-2004, 06:18 PM	#13
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	This is a shitty situation because all three of these teams are good and stuff, but only two could play for the national championship and really I don't see how you can say one of the two they chose wasn't deserving. This just helps make the case for a playoff system, thats how it should have been and there wouldn't be this drama.

12-07-2004, 07:07 PM	#14
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	Yeah there should be a playoff, but they NCAA is all about the $$$