![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
QUESTION - What are the differences in philosophies between Heyman and Steph McMahon?
QUESTION - What are the differences in philosophies between Heyman and Steph McMahon?
So apparently - Stephanie was responsible for having Heyman removed from the creative team. My question is, on what stuff did they disagree on? What were the main issues? Does anyone on here know? The only thing that I know, is that they disagreed on the Cruiserweights. If I understand correctly, Paul Heyman wanted to push the CW division.......while Stephanie was against it. Since this is the only issue that I'm aware of (in terms of Heyman/Steph's difference), I will comment on this. Basically - I DO think that the CW division/title should be CANCELLED. The WWE does a terrible job with the CW division IMO. Ultimately - the CW division basically serves as a "kiss of death" in terms of wrestlers winning any other singles title. In the WWE, it's basically a stigma to be labelled a "cruiserweight". If it was up to me, the CW division would be replaced with a Hardcore 24/7 title/division. The Cruiserweight style of wrestling would still exist, but they would exist in the tag team division, United States title division, and even the WWE title division. Without an actual CW title, guys like Billy Kidman, Paul London, and Rey Mysterio can win more important titles. |
![]() |
![]() |