![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
So long, Eddie! miss you.
Posts: 1,910
![]() ![]() ![]() |
finishers
OK, so finishers are so-called because they finish off a match.
However, do you ppl think that more matches should be decided without using a finisher. Say, if a wrestler does a super-plex, should that not, on occasions, then lead to a pin fall? Top 5 Favourite wrestlers: 1. Carlito Cool 2. Chris Benoit 3. Randy Orton 4. Christian 5. Kurt Angle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: 61,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree. I would like to see moves that makes the commentators go "OMG that has to be it!" win matches occasionally. Superplexes, DDTs, Powerbombs, Piledrivers, etc. Have a few moves play the role of "universal" finishers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Franchise of TPWW
Posts: 15,458
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They only really do that with guys they're building heavily, Brock for example when he was being built up won his matches with 3 or 4 different moves. Hell he beat Hulk F'n Hogan with a bearhug.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
jWo 4 Lyfe!
Posts: 3,268
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If Petey Williams went to the WWE at any point he would have to use these so called 'universal' finishers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
It's Hammer Time
Posts: 2,207
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The problem is after years of seeing people kick out of anything that isn't a guy's finisher people will go "What teh hell? [name] lost to THAT move? What a weak guy!"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Satanic Mechanic
Posts: 52,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
They keep/kept their matches interesting because they're not totally formulaic. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
So fucking sexy.
Posts: 20,100
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
*sigh* This company sux.
|
![]() |
![]() |