Who does HBK think he is?

**Jordan** · 03-08-2006, 06:05 PM

Really try to think about this... HBK was on top of the wrestling work for only about two and a half years... He was running in the IC title division from like 92-95, and then main event status from 95-98... Does that make him the legend he thinks that he is? I don't think so. Sure he has had some of the best matches in WWE History... but name your top five WWE matches of all time, how many of them include HBK? Chances are maybe one or two, most people would say Bret/Austin from WM 13, Austin/Rock from WM 17, Bret/Owen from WM 10, Undertaker/Mankind from KOTR 98, HHH/Cactus Jack from RR 2000 or No Way Out 2000, or Savage/Steamboat from WM 3.... Sure the Razor/HBK ladder match was amazing for the time, but does it hold up now? Not really, its nothing compared to the ladder matches we have today... or how about Bret/HBK at WM 12? Hardly a five star match, we all know it, no matter how much we want to respect it, the first twenty minutes of that match are very dull. At least the Rock/HHH Iron Man match was non-stop. HBK is totally full of himself, yes he has had great matches... however not the best in WWE history. Honestly I think HBK's best matches have been since his return from his back surgery. If HBK is thinking he has nothing left to proove, he is wrong. He has a lot to proove if he wants to justify his huge ego. He is nowhere near the stardom of Austin, Rock, Hogan, Hart, or honestly Triple H. Maybe he has been wrestling for nearly twenty years, but that doens't mean much, name one four star match that The Rockers had? Name more than five four star matches that HBK had for the Intercontinental Title, name more than five for the World Title? Im not saying it can't be done, but you truely have to think. So what im getting at is, if you agree with me post what matches or feuds you think HBK would have to be apart of to be as good as his reputation is? If you disagree, tell me why, and proove it to me.

03-08-2006, 06:05 PM	#1
Jordan It's a blood match! Posts: 27,382	Who does HBK think he is? Really try to think about this... HBK was on top of the wrestling work for only about two and a half years... He was running in the IC title division from like 92-95, and then main event status from 95-98... Does that make him the legend he thinks that he is? I don't think so. Sure he has had some of the best matches in WWE History... but name your top five WWE matches of all time, how many of them include HBK? Chances are maybe one or two, most people would say Bret/Austin from WM 13, Austin/Rock from WM 17, Bret/Owen from WM 10, Undertaker/Mankind from KOTR 98, HHH/Cactus Jack from RR 2000 or No Way Out 2000, or Savage/Steamboat from WM 3.... Sure the Razor/HBK ladder match was amazing for the time, but does it hold up now? Not really, its nothing compared to the ladder matches we have today... or how about Bret/HBK at WM 12? Hardly a five star match, we all know it, no matter how much we want to respect it, the first twenty minutes of that match are very dull. At least the Rock/HHH Iron Man match was non-stop. HBK is totally full of himself, yes he has had great matches... however not the best in WWE history. Honestly I think HBK's best matches have been since his return from his back surgery. If HBK is thinking he has nothing left to proove, he is wrong. He has a lot to proove if he wants to justify his huge ego. He is nowhere near the stardom of Austin, Rock, Hogan, Hart, or honestly Triple H. Maybe he has been wrestling for nearly twenty years, but that doens't mean much, name one four star match that The Rockers had? Name more than five four star matches that HBK had for the Intercontinental Title, name more than five for the World Title? Im not saying it can't be done, but you truely have to think. So what im getting at is, if you agree with me post what matches or feuds you think HBK would have to be apart of to be as good as his reputation is? If you disagree, tell me why, and proove it to me.