Cena: The Wrestler.

**Xero** · 05-20-2007, 12:10 PM

Now, I understand why most people hate Cena, his gimmick. But let's take the gimmick and his super push away and look at his wrestling, which is something I hear people bash time and time again (myself included, admittedly, but out of parody).

When I look at his wrestling, I do not see much of a difference between him and someone like Rock and Austin (in his Attitude prime). He pulls out decent matches when he's wrestling in a brawler style (Umaga/Cena from the Rumble) and is very comparable to Austin in style.

My question is, why do the people who think it think his wrestling sucks when there have been main eventers who did less than him in his past and some of the biggest names in the industry (Hogan, Austin, Rock) did about the same or even less?

And before anyone points it out, yes, Austin WAS a good wrestler, but he got over on his brawling and THAT'S what I'm comparing Cena to, not from before the Stone Cold gimmick/style.

05-20-2007, 12:10 PM	#1
Xero He's Here Posts: 60,735	Cena: The Wrestler. Now, I understand why most people hate Cena, his gimmick. But let's take the gimmick and his super push away and look at his wrestling, which is something I hear people bash time and time again (myself included, admittedly, but out of parody). When I look at his wrestling, I do not see much of a difference between him and someone like Rock and Austin (in his Attitude prime). He pulls out decent matches when he's wrestling in a brawler style (Umaga/Cena from the Rumble) and is very comparable to Austin in style. My question is, why do the people who think it think his wrestling sucks when there have been main eventers who did less than him in his past and some of the biggest names in the industry (Hogan, Austin, Rock) did about the same or even less? And before anyone points it out, yes, Austin WAS a good wrestler, but he got over on his brawling and THAT'S what I'm comparing Cena to, not from before the Stone Cold gimmick/style.