![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Last week's Raw Ratings were 3.3 and 3.1
Not as stellar a comeback as we were told, but still an improvement.
“There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.”--John Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's about 5.5 and 5 million viewers, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: 4,834
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I thought I read somewhere that for the past two weeks the ratings were 3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: 4,834
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
WWE RAW Rating Is In; NFL vs. WWE
Written by: Steve Carrier - August 14th, 2007 For the second week in a row, RAW scored a 3.8 cable rating. RAW did hours of 3.7 and 3.9. On a side note, WWE RAW beat the NFL preseason game on ESPN. (Credit: PWInsider.com) ---- I grabbed this from wrestling-edge.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Licking The Lid of Life
Posts: 580
![]() ![]()
|
Cue 6 months of McMahon and his bastard, but good figures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: 4,834
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is Nielson's like THE PLACE to go to to find accurate rating numbers?
Anyways, either one of the ratings is better than that 2.5 rating they earned a few weeks ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Everyone else declares these other numbers and you always show significantly lower numbers. I'm not saying that you're lying, but 2+ legit sites always report the higher numbers. Edit: Bah, just found another non-wrestling site showing the lower numbers. Looks like someone's either taking them from an unreliable source or are embellishing them. Last edited by Xero; 08-15-2007 at 08:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I don't mean that to be sarcastic, but NMR is the ratings company they use. Everyone uses them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
The numbers actually given by Nielsen are ALWAYS lower than the ones given in wrestling ratings news. I have NEVER seen the numbers tied or exceed the claimed ratings. On the two instances where I've seen WWE give concrete numbers, they've agreed with Nielsen Media and not with the internet reports. The wrestling sites all seem to crib them from the same place, and I don't know why the disconnect, but if even WWE's agreeing with the Nielsen ratings, especially since they're lower... |
|
|
|
|