![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬
Posts: 16,011
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Would the Lakers be better without Kobe...
and replaced with LeBron James? Or worse? Or virtually no difference? Discuss.
Last edited by Jura; 05-19-2008 at 09:28 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
LAKE SHOW HOES
Posts: 25,768
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nah dude, good topic though. We would not be better if we had Lebron instead of Kobe, we would be worse. Kobe is a leader, he is an All-NBA 1st defensive team player, has matured so much, gets his teammates involved, and has the ability to explode at any given minute. I don't think LeBron is on Kobe's level yet. LeBron, however, in a few years, will be the best basketball player in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Temporary
Posts: 15,617
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think they would be about the same, but maybe slightly worse.
|
|
|