![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
why isn't Smackdown live?
Can somebody tell me why Raw is live and Smackdown isn't?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 38,940
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I dunno, is it something to do with the network that shows it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
But, then again, I'm just speculating. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Baird
Posts: 27,345
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Probably a cost issue. That and having all your TV for the week recorded on two consecutive days probably makes things easier.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
UPN's always been a little iffy about wrestling from what I've seen. With some of the shit pulled on live WWE TV, who can blame them?
Cable's a different ballgame, and Smackdown's on earlier (By a whole hour, but still enough to make a difference in Prime Time). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Forum Happy Cat
Posts: 7,884
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
also, UPN would be much less tolerant about SD overrunning than Spike TV is about RAW overrunning
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you mean, given that UPN has a couple of shows people give a fu>ck about, as opposed to Spike, which struggles to get its viewers into double digits half the time?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Part time poster
Posts: 22,963
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I had to say it in capitals so people would listen. No doubt this post will get ignored and blah blah blah. It costs some like 35% more money to film live. WWE can afford it and discussed running live before but scheduling ruins it. Also, they consider it their #2 show. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Thread Killer
Posts: 613
![]() ![]() |
I hear you.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Takes my pain away
Posts: 2,793
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
^
![]() I think if Smackdown is live, the novelty of the 'live' show will wear off. WWE is trying to establish the brand extension by having one show live and one taped. Smackdown will just be another Raw if WWE holds it live. |
![]() |