![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: 24,527
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There's too much emphasis on Wrestlemania
It has a lot of history and prestige (as far as wrestling events can possibly have), and should be hyped as the most important pay per view. However, I don't think that an entire year of wrestling should revolve around what should happen at Wrestlemania. I hear a lot of people saying "Oh yeah that would be an awesome feud! I would love for that match to be at Wrestlemania." If it would be an awesome feud, then there is no need to save it for Wrestlemania. Let Unforgiven have some of those great feuds.
It seems today that the WWE tries to save its least most over-done feuds to be held during Wrestlemania season, which means putting some guy in a match with either The Undertaker or Shawn Michaels. Part of what made wrestling good ten years ago is that it felt constantly exciting throughout the entire year. It didn't feel like they were saving all of the good matches for Wrestlemania (other than Austin against The Rock I guess). Last edited by DrA; 06-25-2009 at 10:55 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |