![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,534
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why does WWE bother...
...to call the WWE Unified Tag Team Champions and Championship by that name? Why not call it/them the WWE Undisputed Tag Team Championship/Champions? Is it so we'll know that both guys in a given tag team are unified in their effort to keep the belts for as long as possible?
I am seriously at a loss here, folks. Let's DISCUSS. OKGO ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
So fucking sexy.
Posts: 20,100
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Probably to make it easier to separate them down the road.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Skibbidy Lock Jaw
Posts: 88,592
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"I challenge you... for only two of your four belts!! Ha ha!"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ghost town
Posts: 1,192
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why not call it the WWE Tag Team Championship and use the World Tag Team belts?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,534
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think personally, that it would serve WWE best in the long run to drop "Unified" from the name of the title, in favor of "Undisputed" and create ONE new tag belt to signify that the current belts are "unified".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Semantics...SERIOUS BIZNESS.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Posts: 71
![]() |
i agree that they made it that way so they can do that later once they see that it is not working. The only thing good that has come out of it is that good superstars can be seen on any show then there home show.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,534
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Posts: 61,515
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kane Knight is right -- merely semantics. Personally, I hate it when they use "unified" or "undisputed" in a title's name. It just seems redundant once the unification has been done. I'd rather they called the current Tag Team Champions the "WWE World Tag Team Champions."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
So fucking sexy.
Posts: 20,100
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nah. I'm thinking, down the road, there'll be a Tornado Tag Fatal Fourway, with two teams getting pinfalls at the same time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Ask him!"
Posts: 10,072
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was thinking triple threat match with the first fall being for the World Tag Titles and the second being for the WWE Tag Titles, a la IC/Euro Titles match at WM2000.
|
![]() |
![]() |