Stable Wars

**Ol Dirty Dastard** · 09-23-2009, 11:21 PM

lol I'm not going to try fantasy book anything but I think the idea of stable wars has always been a smart one.

Just small stables, b/w 4-6 guys, all over the place adds an element of unpredictability to a situation. It's like gang warfare meets sports teams. It also makes more sense. I never really understand when guys get beaten down after a match and noone comes down to help them, particularly baby faces. It's like, there nice guys, so obv they're gonna have friends in the back, where are they while their buddy is getting smashed by 3 guys getting put through a table?

It also brings pride to a situation. I dunno it worked for the wwe before. Obviously the only way it'd suck is over saturation... making too big of stables and too many.

09-23-2009, 11:21 PM	#1
Ol Dirty Dastard boop/bop/beep Posts: 38,430	Stable Wars lol I'm not going to try fantasy book anything but I think the idea of stable wars has always been a smart one. Just small stables, b/w 4-6 guys, all over the place adds an element of unpredictability to a situation. It's like gang warfare meets sports teams. It also makes more sense. I never really understand when guys get beaten down after a match and noone comes down to help them, particularly baby faces. It's like, there nice guys, so obv they're gonna have friends in the back, where are they while their buddy is getting smashed by 3 guys getting put through a table? It also brings pride to a situation. I dunno it worked for the wwe before. Obviously the only way it'd suck is over saturation... making too big of stables and too many. Team Toxic 4 lyfe