DISCUSSION - If the WWE Rosters were unified, what do you think things would be like?

**Heyman** · 12-04-2009, 01:22 AM

DISCUSSION - If the WWE Rosters were unified, what do you think things would be like?

Disclaimer - this thread isn't meant to debate as to whether the rosters should be re-united (as there are probably tons of threads that have dealt with that).

Seriously though - what do you think the WWE would be like if there was ONE unified roster.....just like it was pre-2002? Would the shows be better with more depth? Would the titles mean more due there being 'less'? (i.e. I am assuming that many of the titles would be re-unified). Would be more wrestlers be held back? Could one argue that even though more wrestlers would be "held back", the one's that actually get through that 'ceiling' would be that much bigger and better for it? (as opposed to if they 'broke through' with on a certain show with split rosters). Would a roster re-unification even be FEASIBLE? (now that the WWE roster as a whole is signficantly smaller than it was back in 2002). Which wrestlers would benefit the most? (btw, my answer to that would be 'The Miz' and 'CM Punk.') Which wrestlers would get hurt the most?

12-04-2009, 01:22 AM	#1
Heyman Father of Hinduship Posts: 21,083	DISCUSSION - If the WWE Rosters were unified, what do you think things would be like? DISCUSSION - If the WWE Rosters were unified, what do you think things would be like? Disclaimer - this thread isn't meant to debate as to whether the rosters should be re-united (as there are probably tons of threads that have dealt with that). Seriously though - what do you think the WWE would be like if there was ONE unified roster.....just like it was pre-2002? Would the shows be better with more depth? Would the titles mean more due there being 'less'? (i.e. I am assuming that many of the titles would be re-unified). Would be more wrestlers be held back? Could one argue that even though more wrestlers would be "held back", the one's that actually get through that 'ceiling' would be that much bigger and better for it? (as opposed to if they 'broke through' with on a certain show with split rosters). Would a roster re-unification even be FEASIBLE? (now that the WWE roster as a whole is signficantly smaller than it was back in 2002). Which wrestlers would benefit the most? (btw, my answer to that would be 'The Miz' and 'CM Punk.') Which wrestlers would get hurt the most? Last edited by Heyman; 12-04-2009 at 01:26 AM.