Not just because I'm a Nash mark but...

**Loose Cannon** · 09-12-2007, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla

You're right about Nash being over, which is exactly why he had nothing to gain from beating Goldberg. It should've been somebody else.

I agree. He had nothing to gain. That's why they should of held off and built up another guy toward his first Title win.

**Theo Dious** · 09-13-2007, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loose Cannon

I agree. He had nothing to gain. That's why they should of held off and built up another guy toward his first Title win.

Whoever that person was would have gone on to job to Hogan, this making it useless anyways.

Additionally, when Nash ended the streak, it proved how useless he was. He was never really over again after that.