Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallen Angel
Im not going to contest that, but It did not make the movie any better, I just found the monster to be lackluster, the camera was annoying as hell, it had like no plot but running around, and the worst ending ever.
I felt like I paid $10 just to see what the monster looked like.
|
To each his own about the monster and the camera. But I don't get the no plot argument. It had a plot, a simple one. Monster attacks city, guy tries to save girl and escape. That's enough. People are complaining about how there was such a lack of explanation for the monster, but what are they supposed to do, have some scientist come out of nowhere and give a perfect explanation of what it is?
It's not even a 90 minute movie. If it got bogged down in plot, it would kill the pacing. I like that there was no explanation for the monster. All the more interesting. All you have to know is it's big, it's mean, it's a force of destruction. This is a popcorn flick, not Atonement or something. Who needs that much plot in a movie like this?