Whaaa? *TNA SPOILERS*

**Mr. Nerfect** · 09-16-2008, 10:15 PM

What the fuck is everyone's fucking problem with this? Honestly, gold in the WWE suddenly gets moronic "this is crap!" treatment everywhere else. Why the fuck is Mick Foley -- arguably the best talker and one of the best big match performers in professional wrestling -- going to TNA bad? We are getting Kurt fucking Angle, the best wrestler in the world, versus Mick fucking Foley. If that's a bad thing to you, stop watching fucking wrestling.

Yes, there is some irony involved in the feud, but I'm willing to bet that Foley will make it work by cutting a promo where he puts over Samoa Joe as a guy he recommended for the WWE that has instead paved his own way, proving that veterans can learn from the young talent sometimes. OK, Mick Foley may not be a technical genius at this stage of his career (or at any stage of his career), and Angle vs. Jarrett might be the better actual wrestling match, but they seem to be giving that actual build, and saving it as a big chapter of their old guys vs. young guys feud.

You people do realise you're complaining about Jeff Jarrett, a guy you all constantly bitched about when he was wrestling, being subbed out for Mick Foley, a guy pretty much universally loved? What the fuck is wrong with some of you?

09-16-2008, 10:15 PM	#10
Mr. Nerfect Posts: 61,634	What the fuck is everyone's fucking problem with this? Honestly, gold in the WWE suddenly gets moronic "this is crap!" treatment everywhere else. Why the fuck is Mick Foley -- arguably the best talker and one of the best big match performers in professional wrestling -- going to TNA bad? We are getting Kurt fucking Angle, the best wrestler in the world, versus Mick fucking Foley. If that's a bad thing to you, stop watching fucking wrestling. Yes, there is some irony involved in the feud, but I'm willing to bet that Foley will make it work by cutting a promo where he puts over Samoa Joe as a guy he recommended for the WWE that has instead paved his own way, proving that veterans can learn from the young talent sometimes. OK, Mick Foley may not be a technical genius at this stage of his career (or at any stage of his career), and Angle vs. Jarrett might be the better actual wrestling match, but they seem to be giving that actual build, and saving it as a big chapter of their old guys vs. young guys feud. You people do realise you're complaining about Jeff Jarrett, a guy you all constantly bitched about when he was wrestling, being subbed out for Mick Foley, a guy pretty much universally loved? What the fuck is wrong with some of you?