![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
King of the Ring
Posts: 8,848
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am too busy marking out when edge wins a belt to care if it's clean or not. He's the ultimate opportunist, winning clean would make him the ultimate heel, and HHH has that designation on special reservation. The way he wins further cements his legacy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I Can't See 87% of You
Posts: 2,134
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They also let Gilberg hold the Light HeavyWeight title for something like 15 months. Was that for his hard work?
I don't have a problem with Edge holding the belt, i find him very entertaining. ( i love that he brought back the pose on smackdown friday) But in my opinion just having the belt doesn't mean you are a champion. I think that it loses its meaning of being the champ unless you can validate it and i don't feel that they have ever validated him being the champion. Has he ever gotten a clean win on Cena, Batista or Undertaker? Ric Flair in his day being champ won many times by cheating and interfearence, but also would have clean wins over his biggest opponents back in the day validating him being the champ. Maybe i just like the old days alittle more when it seemed like the champ meant something. Now there are too many titles and i think it hurts more than helps with the image and prestidge of being a champion. |
![]() |
![]() |