Spoilers: yes or no.

**Fabien Barthez** · 08-12-2009, 01:48 PM

But what do you have to post about after the fights, if not the fights?

What is wrong with not coming here until you see the fights?

If you want, I will post the fight vids, since I watch every show live. I won't have to 'kill time' and find myself getting results 'spoiled' for me, by reading threads about the fights I haven't seen.

Please, as one man to another, just say for the first time that the fight got spoiled for you, because you acted without a modicum of common sense. That is all I want. Man the fuck up! I want to respect you, but the way you are just ignoring all criticism and the only point you keep giving is about how hard it is to post spoiler tags is stopping me from having any chance of doing so.

last point, then I'm out for the night and you have about 5 hours to say whatever you like, unretorted. The only people to vote yes, by my guessing is you, Funky and Reavant, by accident. Not one regular user of this forum has backed this rule. How do you justify it's existance? Why would majority rule not be the democratic option here?

View Poll Results: Do you think the rule on spoilers is a good thing?
yes	5	21.74%
no	18	78.26%
Voters: 23. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

08-12-2009, 01:48 PM	#21
Fabien Barthez Spliff & A Brew Posts: 6,754	But what do you have to post about after the fights, if not the fights? What is wrong with not coming here until you see the fights? If you want, I will post the fight vids, since I watch every show live. I won't have to 'kill time' and find myself getting results 'spoiled' for me, by reading threads about the fights I haven't seen. Please, as one man to another, just say for the first time that the fight got spoiled for you, because you acted without a modicum of common sense. That is all I want. Man the fuck up! I want to respect you, but the way you are just ignoring all criticism and the only point you keep giving is about how hard it is to post spoiler tags is stopping me from having any chance of doing so. last point, then I'm out for the night and you have about 5 hours to say whatever you like, unretorted. The only people to vote yes, by my guessing is you, Funky and Reavant, by accident. Not one regular user of this forum has backed this rule. How do you justify it's existance? Why would majority rule not be the democratic option here?