CM Punk needs clean and decisive victories over atleast 2 of the "Big 5" in the WWE

[Mogadishu]

Originally Posted by Tedious For the love of god, it is not good booking for heels to get clean wins over credible faces.

Excuse me?

-Triple H over Foley back in 2000......3 times.
-Triple H over Chris Jericho back in 2000 (last man Standing match)
-Dave Batista over Chris Benoit back in late 2004/early 2005 (can't remember the exact date).
-Randy Orton over Chris Benoit 2004.
-Brock Lesnar over The Rock 2002.
-Randy Orton over Rob Van Dam 2004.
-Brock Lesnar over Undertaker in 2002.

There are many more examples. What you are saying is simply not true.

In NONE of these cases, were the opposing faces negatively affected to the point where they lost all credibility. The heels on the other hand, benefited greatly from these clean victories. Now obviously, CM Punk isn't big enough physically to start dominating opponents with vicious power bombs, spears, etc., etc. However, I think it would be awesome if CM Punk just flat out beat other wrestlers using pure skill.

Would CM Punk have to win cleanly all the time? Of course not. However - more clean victories definitely would not hurt.

If the WWE keeps allowing Punk to defeat the Undertaker while being shown to be CLEARLY inferior....like their match at Breaking Point where Taker basically made Punk tap out and then only lost because he was too busy staring at Long....then it ultimately does NOTHING for Punk.

John Bradshaw Layfield a few years ago, is a good example. As a heelish champ, he always looked extremely inferior to the likes of Undertaker, etc., and barely scored victories. Ultimately, when his title reign came to an end, most of his crediblity came to a halt as well.

Lastly, in regards to CM Punk, he is legitimately the biggest and best thing to happen to the WWE in a few years. The WWE should make CM Punk look as credible and efficient as possible. If not now, do it eventually.