National Rugby League on Spike

**Indifferent Clox** · 09-10-2009, 09:24 PM

Very excited as I've never understood rugby but always have been mad interested in it.

Question though... On SETA they also play rugby, so if I watch this I can watch that too right, or will it be totally different rules and stuff?

**Bad Company** · 09-12-2009, 05:06 AM

NRL is rugby league, not rugby (or rugby union as it's called). They are completely different.

It's currently the finals, so should be good.

**Supreme Olajuwon** · 09-12-2009, 12:16 PM

I was watching it last night. It was good but compared to Union it's really kinda boring.

**Bad Company** · 09-12-2009, 08:52 PM

Yeah, I really prefer union. Still, some pretty amazing players in the NRL.

**Downunder** · 09-12-2009, 10:53 PM

League is rather one dimensional but for the casual observer far easier to understand.

Union is proper Rugby

**The Pope** · 09-12-2009, 11:07 PM

i don't get this union,league thing.
is it like NFL,AFL or what are you guys comparing?

**Bad Company** · 09-12-2009, 11:34 PM

They are two different games.

**toxic rooster** · 09-13-2009, 02:40 AM

They have a lot of similarities. Over here the best rugby league players often spend a few years in rugby (union) because it's bigger internationally and there's a lot more money in it. Often as backs/wingers/centres. So if you're good at one, the other one can be picked up

Rugby (union) has 15 players a side and the ball is always in contest. When a guy gets tackled, there's a ruck where players from both teams come in and try to take the ball. Same thing on a scrum (which is where the forwards on both teams pack together, the scrumhalf puts the ball in between them and they fight for it) and lineouts (where the ball is out of play, the teams line up, guy on the other team throws it between them and they fight for it). Rugby props are generally bigger than league props, and it's a lot harder to gain territory by running with the ball, which is why you see more kicking in rugby.

Rugby league is a derivative of rugby, with a few rule changes that make the game more conducive to running the ball. Tackles, scrums and out-of-bounds restarts are not in contest, you have 6 tackles to get the ball as far as you can. I like to see guys running the ball so league is more entertaining to me, though that may also be due to my Queensland public school upbringing.

For the incredibly casual observer, watch till the first guy gets tackled. If 4 people from his team don't jump on top and try to get the ball out from under him, you're watching league.

**Stickman** · 09-13-2009, 06:26 PM

I love real rugby. 15 a side, anything but is terrible.

**toxic rooster** · 09-13-2009, 10:12 PM

You're fine to think that, I just find rugby is slow and stop-start in comparison. I appreciate the contest involved but being used to the faster ruck in league, union rucks make me cringe sometimes. Especially the amount of things you can do to slow it down, the English being particularly adept at this.

I should also mention for the casual observer the kicking game changes from union to league. In union, kicks in play are all about gaining territory or earning points (3 for a drop-goal). In league, drop-goals are only worth 1 point so you don't really see that unless the game is tied. Also in league there are a variety of attacking kicks you will see near the opponent's line - chips, bombs, grubbers and even the odd banana. You won't see these near as much in rugby because of the rules about fielding kicks in the defensive third.

**redoneja** · 09-18-2009, 07:27 PM

So is rugby league what is most played here in the states? My university won the national title in rugby last year or the year before, but I have no idea whether it was in union or league.

Also, thanks Gooner for explaining rugby. Now I just need someone to tell me how cricket is played and I'll be good to go

**redoneja** · 09-18-2009, 07:28 PM

Ok apparently we won the Div II National Title in 03 and 08. Still no clue whether it's Union or League though.

**Bad Company** · 09-18-2009, 08:16 PM

Union.

**redoneja** · 09-19-2009, 11:08 AM

So I watched some of that National Rugby League show. Really did not understand what was going on at all. All I could get out of it was one team would snap the ball, run it for 3-5m and then get tackled, rinse and repeat. Once they got to about midfield they would kick it downfield, the other team would get the ball and the process would start over.

Obviously I get that I didn't 'understand' it because it was the first time I've ever watched rugby (in any form).

**Stickman** · 09-19-2009, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redoneja

So I watched some of that National Rugby League show. Really did not understand what was going on at all. All I could get out of it was one team would snap the ball, run it for 3-5m and then get tackled, rinse and repeat. Once they got to about midfield they would kick it downfield, the other team would get the ball and the process would start over.

Obviously I get that I didn't 'understand' it because it was the first time I've ever watched rugby (in any form).

If you ever see real rugby watch it. There's a lot more going on that makes it more entertaining. In this league, yeah, you're description is pretty bang on. I personally find it very boring with no strategy.

**Ol Dirty Dastard** · 09-20-2009, 02:00 PM

The scrum and the breakdown and the lineouts are the 3 biggest parts of the game and that's what rugby leage lacks.

The scrum itself is pure psycological warfare.

**Stickman** · 09-20-2009, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead

The scrum and the breakdown and the lineouts are the 3 biggest parts of the game and that's what rugby leage lacks.

The scrum itself is pure psycological warfare.

Exactly, there's really not much to the league. Run, get tackled, everybody stop, pass, run, repeat. There's no strategy.

**toxic rooster** · 09-23-2009, 11:08 PM

To make league, they reduced the teams to 13 a side and took out a lot of the stuff that slows a union game down (contested rucks, scrums etc) so there's more running and play is turned around faster, which requires players to be fitter in league. That's why forwards in league are leaner than they are in union, and their careers only last till 30ish. And in league, the halves are more effective at putting plays on. If you've been watching league all your life, you'll find union slow, complicated and a bit of a clusterfuck.

If you don't know which is which, just assume you're watching union. Much more widespread. League is only played on the east coast of Australia, parts of England and a few places in NZ.

I'm probably the only person here from a place where league is more popular than union. It exists here, but like some other places it's a richboy game, played by sons of doctors, private school kids and the like. Our team is consistently last in the Supers competition.

The rugby union over here lures a few league players across every year because they can afford to pay players more. They usually end up playing for Australia in rugby too, the Wallabies' last decent run coincided with when they had lured a few leaguies across. In the 2003 World Cup (when Australia made the final), they had 3 leaguies in their backline (Wendell Sailor, Mat Rogers, Lote Tuqiri). Most of them tend to end up back in league (Sailor, Rogers, Timana Tahu have, Lote Tuqiri is thinking about it). Berrick Barnes (current Wallaby) used to be a leaguie, as did Brad Thorn (All Blacks) who switched between league and union twice. Sonny Bill Williams and Mark Gasnier are 2 former league players who are playing club rugby somewhere in Europe right now, Karmichael Hunt will join them soon.

**toxic rooster** · 09-23-2009, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redoneja

All I could get out of it was one team would snap the ball, run it for 3-5m and then get tackled, rinse and repeat. Once they got to about midfield they would kick it downfield, the other team would get the ball and the process would start over.

That sounds exactly like the NFL, except add helmets, pads and stoppages.

**toxic rooster** · 09-24-2009, 03:06 AM

Big rugby league hits

Big rugby union hits

There are some pretty hard hits in both forms of the game. In union the defensive line is right in the ball carrier's face, while in league they're taken back 10 metres on every play which gives guys a chance to pick up speed.

**Downunder** · 09-24-2009, 06:21 AM

I don't know how they survive without crash helmets and pads - they must be some kind of supermen.

**Ol Dirty Dastard** · 09-24-2009, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wee Gooner

Big rugby league hits

Big rugby union hits

There are some pretty hard hits in both forms of the game. In union the defensive line is right in the ball carrier's face, while in league they're taken back 10 metres on every play which gives guys a chance to pick up speed.

This proves nothing though lol.

**Ol Dirty Dastard** · 09-24-2009, 11:57 AM

Also, the Union video has hits from like 10 fucking years ago. Watch this years tri nations, and super 14 and premiership and you'll see guys getting smashed.

Also, most of the league tackles, they didn't even fucking wrap.

**toxic rooster** · 09-24-2009, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead

This proves nothing though lol.

It proves that they hit each other. Were you looking for a cure for cancer?

**Bad Company** · 09-25-2009, 06:44 AM

Bulldogs Eels is fucking epic just going into half time.

**Stickman** · 09-25-2009, 10:17 PM

Watching those clips made me realize I miss playing rugby.

**toxic rooster** · 09-26-2009, 12:28 AM

yeah bulldogs eels was fantastic. hope tonight lives up to it, in front of about 4,000 people in melbourne on AFL grand final day. great scheduling that

**Bad Company** · 09-27-2009, 01:51 AM

Jesus, I hope you haven't killed yourself Gooner.

**toxic rooster** · 09-27-2009, 05:51 AM

Nah, last year was harder to take. I knew we were gone when Lockyer was named at halfback. Last night was pretty miserable, but in all we didn't expect to be there so it was kindof a bonus.

that said...I think I'm going for the eels this week. but as long as a lot of people on both teams get hurt, I'm happy.

09-12-2009, 05:06 AM	#2
Bad Company Mad Posts: 26,228	NRL is rugby league, not rugby (or rugby union as it's called). They are completely different. It's currently the finals, so should be good.

09-12-2009, 12:16 PM	#3
Supreme Olajuwon You know that�s right Posts: 52,755	I was watching it last night. It was good but compared to Union it's really kinda boring.

09-12-2009, 08:52 PM	#4
Bad Company Mad Posts: 26,228	Yeah, I really prefer union. Still, some pretty amazing players in the NRL.

09-12-2009, 10:53 PM	#5
Downunder God Bless America Posts: 37,905	League is rather one dimensional but for the casual observer far easier to understand. Union is proper Rugby

09-12-2009, 11:07 PM	#6
The Pope Pope Is Pimpin' Posts: 4,676	i don't get this union,league thing. is it like NFL,AFL or what are you guys comparing?

09-12-2009, 11:34 PM	#7
Bad Company Mad Posts: 26,228	They are two different games.

09-13-2009, 02:40 AM	#8
toxic rooster adjective noun Posts: 30,417	They have a lot of similarities. Over here the best rugby league players often spend a few years in rugby (union) because it's bigger internationally and there's a lot more money in it. Often as backs/wingers/centres. So if you're good at one, the other one can be picked up Rugby (union) has 15 players a side and the ball is always in contest. When a guy gets tackled, there's a ruck where players from both teams come in and try to take the ball. Same thing on a scrum (which is where the forwards on both teams pack together, the scrumhalf puts the ball in between them and they fight for it) and lineouts (where the ball is out of play, the teams line up, guy on the other team throws it between them and they fight for it). Rugby props are generally bigger than league props, and it's a lot harder to gain territory by running with the ball, which is why you see more kicking in rugby. Rugby league is a derivative of rugby, with a few rule changes that make the game more conducive to running the ball. Tackles, scrums and out-of-bounds restarts are not in contest, you have 6 tackles to get the ball as far as you can. I like to see guys running the ball so league is more entertaining to me, though that may also be due to my Queensland public school upbringing. For the incredibly casual observer, watch till the first guy gets tackled. If 4 people from his team don't jump on top and try to get the ball out from under him, you're watching league.

09-13-2009, 06:26 PM	#9
Stickman Stickman Posts: 15,119	I love real rugby. 15 a side, anything but is terrible.

09-13-2009, 10:12 PM	#10
toxic rooster adjective noun Posts: 30,417	You're fine to think that, I just find rugby is slow and stop-start in comparison. I appreciate the contest involved but being used to the faster ruck in league, union rucks make me cringe sometimes. Especially the amount of things you can do to slow it down, the English being particularly adept at this. I should also mention for the casual observer the kicking game changes from union to league. In union, kicks in play are all about gaining territory or earning points (3 for a drop-goal). In league, drop-goals are only worth 1 point so you don't really see that unless the game is tied. Also in league there are a variety of attacking kicks you will see near the opponent's line - chips, bombs, grubbers and even the odd banana. You won't see these near as much in rugby because of the rules about fielding kicks in the defensive third.

09-18-2009, 07:27 PM	#11
redoneja Posts: 5,629	So is rugby league what is most played here in the states? My university won the national title in rugby last year or the year before, but I have no idea whether it was in union or league. Also, thanks Gooner for explaining rugby. Now I just need someone to tell me how cricket is played and I'll be good to go

09-18-2009, 07:28 PM	#12
redoneja Posts: 5,629	Ok apparently we won the Div II National Title in 03 and 08. Still no clue whether it's Union or League though.

09-18-2009, 08:16 PM	#13
Bad Company Mad Posts: 26,228	Union.

09-19-2009, 11:08 AM	#14
redoneja Posts: 5,629	So I watched some of that National Rugby League show. Really did not understand what was going on at all. All I could get out of it was one team would snap the ball, run it for 3-5m and then get tackled, rinse and repeat. Once they got to about midfield they would kick it downfield, the other team would get the ball and the process would start over. Obviously I get that I didn't 'understand' it because it was the first time I've ever watched rugby (in any form).

09-20-2009, 02:00 PM	#16
Ol Dirty Dastard boop/bop/beep Posts: 38,430	The scrum and the breakdown and the lineouts are the 3 biggest parts of the game and that's what rugby leage lacks. The scrum itself is pure psycological warfare.

09-23-2009, 11:08 PM	#18
toxic rooster adjective noun Posts: 30,417	To make league, they reduced the teams to 13 a side and took out a lot of the stuff that slows a union game down (contested rucks, scrums etc) so there's more running and play is turned around faster, which requires players to be fitter in league. That's why forwards in league are leaner than they are in union, and their careers only last till 30ish. And in league, the halves are more effective at putting plays on. If you've been watching league all your life, you'll find union slow, complicated and a bit of a clusterfuck. If you don't know which is which, just assume you're watching union. Much more widespread. League is only played on the east coast of Australia, parts of England and a few places in NZ. I'm probably the only person here from a place where league is more popular than union. It exists here, but like some other places it's a richboy game, played by sons of doctors, private school kids and the like. Our team is consistently last in the Supers competition. The rugby union over here lures a few league players across every year because they can afford to pay players more. They usually end up playing for Australia in rugby too, the Wallabies' last decent run coincided with when they had lured a few leaguies across. In the 2003 World Cup (when Australia made the final), they had 3 leaguies in their backline (Wendell Sailor, Mat Rogers, Lote Tuqiri). Most of them tend to end up back in league (Sailor, Rogers, Timana Tahu have, Lote Tuqiri is thinking about it). Berrick Barnes (current Wallaby) used to be a leaguie, as did Brad Thorn (All Blacks) who switched between league and union twice. Sonny Bill Williams and Mark Gasnier are 2 former league players who are playing club rugby somewhere in Europe right now, Karmichael Hunt will join them soon.

09-24-2009, 03:06 AM	#20
toxic rooster adjective noun Posts: 30,417	Big rugby league hits Big rugby union hits There are some pretty hard hits in both forms of the game. In union the defensive line is right in the ball carrier's face, while in league they're taken back 10 metres on every play which gives guys a chance to pick up speed.

09-24-2009, 06:21 AM	#21
Downunder God Bless America Posts: 37,905	I don't know how they survive without crash helmets and pads - they must be some kind of supermen.

09-24-2009, 11:57 AM	#23
Ol Dirty Dastard boop/bop/beep Posts: 38,430	Also, the Union video has hits from like 10 fucking years ago. Watch this years tri nations, and super 14 and premiership and you'll see guys getting smashed. Also, most of the league tackles, they didn't even fucking wrap.

09-25-2009, 06:44 AM	#25
Bad Company Mad Posts: 26,228	Bulldogs Eels is fucking epic just going into half time.

09-25-2009, 10:17 PM	#26
Stickman Stickman Posts: 15,119	Watching those clips made me realize I miss playing rugby.

09-26-2009, 12:28 AM	#27
toxic rooster adjective noun Posts: 30,417	yeah bulldogs eels was fantastic. hope tonight lives up to it, in front of about 4,000 people in melbourne on AFL grand final day. great scheduling that

09-27-2009, 01:51 AM	#28
Bad Company Mad Posts: 26,228	Jesus, I hope you haven't killed yourself Gooner.

09-27-2009, 05:51 AM	#29
toxic rooster adjective noun Posts: 30,417	Nah, last year was harder to take. I knew we were gone when Lockyer was named at halfback. Last night was pretty miserable, but in all we didn't expect to be there so it was kindof a bonus. that said...I think I'm going for the eels this week. but as long as a lot of people on both teams get hurt, I'm happy.