Question: TNA VS WWE

[Xero]

WWE uses their talent better than TNA when it comes to storylines, TNA just happens to push guys that WWE doesn't see much in for whatever reason (too small, not charismatic enough, etc).

TNA is better with the lower-card in-ring product, but from a business standpoint, that's not going to sell, especially with what style they're selling.

[Wolfpack423]

Originally Posted by Xero WWE uses their talent better than TNA when it comes to storylines, TNA just happens to push guys that WWE doesn't see much in for whatever reason (too small, not charismatic enough, etc). TNA is better with the lower-card in-ring product, but from a business standpoint, that's not going to sell, especially with what style they're selling.

I think WWE's lower card performers which I call their mid card are much more talented than TNA's. I mean you have CM Punk, John Morrison, Jack Swagger, Dolph Ziggler, Drew McIntyre, Ted Dibiase, Cody Rhodes, they're all better than TNAs mid card. And of course there's Christian, Shelton Benjamin etc, but Christian hopefully will be a main eventer soon. I like the main eventers in TNA better except for Abyss who I don't understand why TNA thinks he is that good. He's not bad, but he is not as good as TNA thinks he is.