![]() |
|
|
#81 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Oh wait, that would totally blow a hole in the argument that it's always a work. Why would you want to recognise something like that. That would require using critical thinking and facts to come up with a solid argument.Nobody forgot about Chris Jericho's little rant. However, people don't care, because Jericho's at least talented in the ring. Bradhsaw isn't. Freedom of speech is a two way street.. However, you're a moron if you think that freedom of speech should in any way, shape, or form protect Bradshaw from backlash. It's called freedom of speech because people are now free to respond. I've also got some news for you: Bradshaw is not a new wrestler. It's socking, yes, but some of us "smarts" have ACTUALLY seen him wrestle and are not pre-judging him, but judging his actual work. He's only been around for a couple of decades, so I could see where you were confused there. Finally, Heel work isn't supposed to make you turn off the TV. It's supposed to rile you up so you'll watch the guy, not so you'll say "Fu>ck this shit" and turn off the TV. Bradshaw's reminding us once again that, no matter what role he plays, he's still Bradshaw. He's turned off people who were interested in his gimmick despite his consitently shitty work in-ring. If this is a work, it's as weak as his normal work. I know the thought of Bradshaw in the main event will keep me from ordering the PPV... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
WordLife
Posts: 705
|
I understand Bradshaw has the right of freedom of speech, but he made himself look like an even bigger idiot by making idiotic comments in his column. Resorting to name calling and questioning someone's sexuality is something teenagers are prone to do. Someone who is a well respected financial analyst should be able to say something more intelligent and constructive than, "I shoved you in your locker and made you do my homework in high school!" Get what I'm saying lone drinker?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Part time poster
Posts: 22,963
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Coming from someone who is known for threatening to arse rape wrestlers in the showers, that was the quite the comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Takes my pain away
Posts: 2,793
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, then i'm not surprised at all that Bradshaw made that comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
Cowboy
Posts: 450
|
Quote:
As far as Bradshaw's wrestling skill goes, beauty is within the eye of the beholder. Some of us like brawlers such as Bradshaw, The Undertaker, Mick Foley, Steve Austin, etc, etc. Not everyone is down with mat wrestling. I enjoy Bradshaw's ring work. I think for a bigger guy, he moves very well and his new character entertains me every week. To me, Guerrero's last match, and Bradshaw's last match on Smackdown, I was more entertained with Bradshaw. Guerrero matches I am not entertained by and I am not trying to say he has never entertained me, but, more so on a mid card level. I am adding all the variables in what provide an entertaining match, to me anyways. So as an overall wrestler, Bradshaw is one of the best on Smackdown. Ring Psych is more important than gymnastics in my opinion, when it comes to Sports Entertainment. Everyone on the net is always saying how the WWE needs to build new superstars, the WWE did just that and now you fellas are saying....."Yeah, build new superstars, but NOT Bradshaw......I can understand his hate for the internet, it's the same type of shit that I refuse to read. All the Smarks just seem to know it all, yet they can't offer one halfway decent suggestion. They have no clue what they want, but they do know what they don't want. No Bradshaw and no Triple H... I'm sure on that alone, the companies problems could be solved.....yeah, that's sarcasm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Takes my pain away
Posts: 2,793
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
wow explosive, but it indeed makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Screw Boston. CHEATERS!
Posts: 264
![]()
|
Sure it's absolutely frustrating. But you're entertaining millions of people everywhere, critism will come, and if you can't bring it, then the critism is going to be bad. JBL had no business doing this to internet fans.
Yeah, we all know he's a heel. But this column was OBVIOUSLY not kayfabe. The man is insecure. If he can't handle the critism of the main event scene, then he should step down and leave it to guys who can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
*reps* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Stickman
Posts: 15,119
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Did Bob Holly lash out at the internet for saying how much he sucks and shouldn't be main eventing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |||||||||
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
People are lashing right back, not saying "YOU CAN'T SAY THAT!!!!!!!!!!" Please try to understand the difference. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I am getting a pretty good picture of you right now, though, and the word "moron" comes up every time I read your posts. Quote:
Quote:
![]() Where did I imply that you were new to pro wrestling? I could have been implying that you were an idiot. Or I could have been simply been using the sarcasm you're so fond of. But by all means, keep ranting. Quote:
Quote:
So basically, you're lashing out because your minority opinion is being shit on. Quote:
![]() You know what? It's not my duty to offer a half-decent suggestion. Even if the WWE took such suggestions, the WWE is the entertainer, not me. If they want to give me a salary, then we'll talk. Wrestling's not doing so hot right now, and everyone wants to blame the smarks for complaining, but we're on the other end of the formula. As I've said before, entertainment is designed to pander to us, not vice versa. The "smarks" know exactly what they want...They want entertainment. And you sir, are a total moron. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#91 | |
|
IT'S ALL ABOUT OUR THING
Posts: 4,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
But who am I to judge? This is 2004! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
IT'S ALL ABOUT OUR THING
Posts: 4,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
No judging remember?!?This is 2004 bah gawd!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
And you sir, are a total moron, but who am I to judge? This is 2004! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
|
IT'S ALL ABOUT OUR THING
Posts: 4,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
All I'm saying is, he's probably more looking at Bradshaw's body, than his "Psychology." He's probably just mad at us because we don't condone the Aberrant Sexual Behaviour in which he and his role-model, Bradshaw engage. but who am I to judge? It's 2004!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
IT'S ALL ABOUT OUR THING
Posts: 4,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ANd thus, a new TPWW catchphrase is born.
"Who am I to judge? Its 2004! |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Takes my pain away
Posts: 2,793
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh yeh, the new catchphrase...
If ya smellll............. (5 years out of fashion) "Who am I to judge? It's 2004!" lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Why So Curious?
Posts: 3,408
![]() ![]()
|
I wouldn't be surprised if this was just another way of one of Vince's employees sucking his cock, though. Have you noticed that quite alot of WWE employees have been slamming the internet lately, quite more than normal. Maybe Vince is tired of us saying how much his ideas blow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
|
Why So Curious?
Posts: 3,408
![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 | |
|
Cowboy
Posts: 450
|
Kane Knight, okay.....well first off....I am going to ignore the insults you made. Because clearly you are trying to provoke me into a flaming war which you will no doubt be the face since you are a semi-loved veteran around these parts, and after a few pages, people who have not even read this whole thread will come in and get the impression I am some cocky stupid newbie trying to "take things over" or some nonsense. Next thing you know.....I am being ganged up on by you and your buddies and when you all realize I don't back down, I will just get the ban from one of your friends who happens to be a Mod. And I realize insulting me is just an attempt to get off the subject of hand since you know you are incorrect so you just get want to change the subject and get into a flame war with me. That's why you called me some new fan to wrestling. Because you knew I'd come in and correct you and next thing you know, we are talking more about me when we should be talking about Bradshaw. With that being said, let's get back to the main topic.
Quote:
When I say "new superstars", I don't mean "young superstars". Bradshaw, Eddie, and Benoit were mid-carding jobbers for most of their careers. Now they are being pushed. And this is really the first time these three guys have been pushed into the main event scene without their hype being taken away from guys like Stone Cold, Hogan, The Rock, etc, etc.....so yes, they are "new" to the main event scene. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't feel like reading your entire retard novella here right now, but I'll get back to it later. one thing that struck me here, is that you differentiate between "young" superstars and "new superstars."
Because we all know, everyone and their mother has been screaming "Push Edge!" Edge is a new Superstar who has never been pushed before, right? ![]() I'm sorry, but your argument gets more absurd every pass. I'll have to check out the rest of your moronic rant when I'm in need of a good laugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Peeps Unite
Posts: 259
|
Thats pure hilarity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
lol, Dark_Kane clan members again.
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Loose Cannon, you're nothing but a stupid smark. You think you're so tough, but you can't take what you dish out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
"Ask him!"
Posts: 10,075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Watch the RKO, KK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Instant Credibility
Posts: 2,979
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I hikn this is the first thread I've read where Kane Knight has been referred to as a "face."
But who am I to judge? it's 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Cowboy
Posts: 450
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
WordLife
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
That's a face tactic, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Cowboy
Posts: 450
|
Quote:
[I bet you're a single dude right? And a very lonely person as well.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
WordLife
Posts: 705
|
For someone who was getting upset because people were making assumptions about him earlier, you shouldn't make stupid assumptions about others like you just did.
KK doesn't say that everyone who disagrees with him is stupid, but you are stupid Lone Drinker. Oh yeah, and with a name like Lone Drinker, I would bet that you're a single dude, and a lonely person as well. But you're definately stupid though... |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Triple A's a bitch
Posts: 1,039
![]()
|
Lone Drinker - take the hint here.
(18 posts / -200 reps) = not a good start |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Instant Credibility
Posts: 2,979
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Lone Drinker, you can huff and puff about you're right to your opinion and Bradhsaw's right to criticize those who criticize him, but the fact of the matter is Judgment Day didn't sell out ( I live in L.A.; it was announced tickets were available-front row included-up until 3 or 4 this afternoon. watching the PPV, its obvious there are tons of empty seats) and the projections for the buy rates have been horrible. Couple this with the fact that Smackdown's ratings have been in the toilet and you start to get the picture that the general wrestling audience has no interest in JBL as a main eventer.
His character is great, but he has no real talent in the ring. As a brawler, he's subpar. There are at least six guys on the Smackdown roster with a similar style that are flat out more talented. Oh yeah...and this "new superstar" that the WWE is trying to create was born on November 29, 1967. He's going on 42. He's had plenty of time to justify this push and it never happened. The WWE slapped a suit on a worker no one cared about in the first place, had him use as many racial slurs as possible ( and still only generated miniaml heat), and now you (and he) are surprised because we as fans still don't give a f>uck? Please....you have the right to an opinion but don't get surprised when it gets shot down by the rest of us. Last edited by PureHatred; 05-17-2004 at 12:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
See, the problem is, you're combining two issues. issue 1: I disagree with you. Issue 2: I think you're a complete and utter moron. I think number 2 is especially born out, because intelligent people are generally able to seperate the two concepts. but wait, I hear you say. You said I was a moron! It's because you don't agree with me! No, I disagree with you because I think you're wrong. I think you're a moron because the arguments you've come up with are largely stupid. But don't let reality get in your way, man. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Cowboy
Posts: 450
|
Well, Kane Knight, you still have not responded to my comments from yesterday. Because you know I am right. So you are just going to sit there and keep repeating yourself and call me all these names and encourage others to do the same.
And since you want to get off the topic of hand in regards of Bradshaw, you are doing anything and everything to try and turn this whole topic about me. I'm flattered really. But there are other forums on here where we can discuss our personals lives. But this forum and thread is about wrestling. Really, if the shoe was on the other foot and I was insulting you and calling you all these names, I would have been banned by now. I think what you are trying to do is get me to insult you back so I will get banned and you won't have someone challenge you in future wrestling debates. You just want everyone to shut up and bow down to you and not dare challenge you huh? Well, I am afraid it is going to take a little more effort then that to get rid of me. PureHatred - Okay, well first of all.....I don't know why everyone thinks that in order to be a new main event superstar, you have to be young. I know how old Bradshaw is and he is new to the main event scene. It's like what I was saying in my last couple of posts.........Eddie and Beniot are around the same age as Bradshaw and they are just now being pushed too. I realize all three of those guys have been around for a while, but they ARE "new" to the main event scene, so yes they are "new superstars" as far as the main event goes. So let me get this straight: You fellas want NEW main eventers....but not guys like Bradshaw or Triple H......BUT WAIT................these new main eventers have to be YOUNG GUYS in their 20's? Guys who have 0 experience in wrestling, are not over with the crowd and have probably never even had an I.C. title run? See....you fellas don't know what the hell you want..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No, because I haven't been able to get through your post without falling out of my chair laughing.
It makes it hard to rebut... but at least you've gotten off your conspiracy theories...
|
|
|
|