![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm spinning it as, when the potential for tarnishing someone's legacy is greater than the potential for two lesser performers to screw up a match, I would rather watch the two lesser performers rather than suffer the heart-ache.
Two amazing wrestlers not being able to live up to their potential seems a greater sin than allowing two fat guys to hit each other with chairs for a while. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Which would you rather watch, though? Also, name one silly stipulation match that tarnished a great workers legacy that wasn't intended to do so (i.e. Saturn in a dress was a punishment). |
|
![]() |
![]() |