Who would you love to be a part of Raw 1000, but most likely won't be?

**Keith** · 07-13-2012, 03:25 PM

I was reading an interview WWE.com put up with Mr McMahon. They talked about WWE, how RAW came about, who the most important superstar in RAW history was, etc. They also touched a bit on WCW Nitro and WCW's demise, and it got me thinking.

If TNA (or any other company, whether it exists today or not) gets really good and is really able to give WWE a run for its money (in other words, if we have another Monday Night War), is Vince McMahon and his company still able to do all they need to do in order to outlast another war like the one we saw in the 90's?

Basically, do you think Vince and the WWE would still have it in them to fight a vicious war like they did with WCW and still come out on top? Or has the "magic" worn out?

07-13-2012, 03:25 PM	#32
Keith Posts: 3,525	I was reading an interview WWE.com put up with Mr McMahon. They talked about WWE, how RAW came about, who the most important superstar in RAW history was, etc. They also touched a bit on WCW Nitro and WCW's demise, and it got me thinking. If TNA (or any other company, whether it exists today or not) gets really good and is really able to give WWE a run for its money (in other words, if we have another Monday Night War), is Vince McMahon and his company still able to do all they need to do in order to outlast another war like the one we saw in the 90's? Basically, do you think Vince and the WWE would still have it in them to fight a vicious war like they did with WCW and still come out on top? Or has the "magic" worn out?