Should Bret have lost @ Survivor Series?

[Joe Kerr]

When you sign a contract you know that you are not in control of your character and the titles, unless your initials are HHH. Bret was told that he was to be defeated and he refused. This would be like If benoit decided he was going to TNA-NWA but refused to lose the title to Kane at Bad Blood.

Originally Posted by Joey Radd When you sign a contract you know that you are not in control of your character and the titles, unless your initials are HHH. Bret was told that he was to be defeated and he refused. This would be like If benoit decided he was going to TNA-NWA but refused to lose the title to Kane at Bad Blood.

Bret had Creative Control. He didn't have to job. He just opted not to since Michaels was being a dick as always.

BTW, is there a time that Michaels ever jobbed to Bret? Every match I remember involving them ended with Shawn winning.

Originally Posted by Funky Fly Bret had Creative Control. He didn't have to job. He just opted not to since Michaels was being a dick as always. BTW, is there a time that Michaels ever jobbed to Bret? Every match I remember involving them ended with Shawn winning.

THANK YOU FUNKY

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by Joey Radd When you sign a contract you know that you are not in control of your character and the titles, unless your initials are HHH. Bret was told that he was to be defeated and he refused. This would be like If benoit decided he was going to TNA-NWA but refused to lose the title to Kane at Bad Blood.

Except it really is a moot point when you're given creative control.

When someone tells you to do something, your job gives you the right to say no, you do so, they agree, and you're still forced to do it in the end, that's totally different.