![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Tîm Defaid
Posts: 6,646
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Predictable response. But the fact that it was Smackdown was not the point. The point is, does your average casual family that orders the odd big PPV really pay any attention or care as to whether a show is live or on a tape delay? I would say no. In fact a huge PPV in a UK stadium would generate some more interest to want to buy if anything as it would have that Wrestlemania feel to it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Traditionally, taped versions of Raw do lower than live versions, even if broadcast as "live." The one major example of a PPV given here suffered a drop in buyrate pre-internet spoilers. None of this is new information, really. Quote:
If you mean "I really really want it to be true despite no evidence, because it would be convenient for it to be true," definitely. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Tîm Defaid
Posts: 6,646
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Let's not pretend that a portion of Wrestlemania buy rates aren't purely due to the occasion rather than the card that's on offer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |