![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is TNA the dumbest wrestling fed with 'worldwide exposure' ever? | |||
| Yes |
|
27 | 71.05% |
| Maybe |
|
11 | 28.95% |
| Voters: 38. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Soundly Defeated Wadding
Posts: 40,590
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If any of you actually decided to watch TNA instead of shit on it every single day, you might enjoy it. I know I do. It's the weirdest thing. Somebody just decided to write it off forever and now everyone is missing out because of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Trickster Demon
Posts: 59,823
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Everytime I decide to 'give them a chance' they just fuck it up. Ex: Austin Aries is champ, cool. Aces & Eights, lame. TNA has spent far too much of it's existence reliant on wrestlers who were big deals in other companies (add MMA fighters to that list now) rather than establish and create their own big name stars. WCW had Sting, Flair, Luger and others who were legit big stars that made a name for themselves in WCW and could sell-out 20,000 seat arenas. TNA does not do that. ECW had their own big name stars and a cult following, and while not selling out 20,000 seat arenas they were presenting a product that was very, very different from WWF or WCW. TNA does not do that. That is where the perception comes from, at least for me. And that whole 'WTF is Dixie Carter thinking' question that pops up every several months when she does something that seems odd or some bizarre newz story breaks. |
|
|
|
|