Talking Point of the Week: Underdogs in wrestling

**Emperor Smeat** · 06-23-2015, 06:15 PM

Least believable - Cena for the past several years.

Austin proved someone doesn't have to always be an underdog to take on an Authority figure or stable considering the havoc he would wreck at times to the Corporation on his own.

Being believable as an underdog is probably one of the most important attributes. Its a big reason why Cena's "against all odds" barely makes any sense most of the time. Same for people who are underdogs in name only but don't get the redemption or sweet rewards like Ziggler post-Survivor Series period.

06-23-2015, 06:15 PM	#6
Emperor Smeat Former TPWW Royalty Posts: 66,674	Least believable - Cena for the past several years. Austin proved someone doesn't have to always be an underdog to take on an Authority figure or stable considering the havoc he would wreck at times to the Corporation on his own. Being believable as an underdog is probably one of the most important attributes. Its a big reason why Cena's "against all odds" barely makes any sense most of the time. Same for people who are underdogs in name only but don't get the redemption or sweet rewards like Ziggler post-Survivor Series period.