![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
( ._.)
Posts: 14,272
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Explain this to me.
If WWE had no intention of featuring Bryan at Mania, why did he go over Cena at Summerslam? Why take the top star in the company and have him JOB to a guy you don't see much in? Why not let them have a competitive match where Cena goes over? Then have Orton cash in MITB and proceed to the Batista v Orton payoff. Why have Bryan get completely screwed out of the title by The Authority in the Fall? Isn't that usually a time where Mania programs start to take shape? Odd how that worked. It possible WWE thought Batista v Orton would be a bigger attraction because Batista had been away from TV and then payoff Bryan winning back the title after Mania. But that's not how WWE usually caps off long running storylines. I think someone mentioned the rumour was Bryan vs Sheamus. And maybe that was true. But maybe the rumoured Punk v HHH match was to get Bryan into the main event. Maybe Sheamus was going to be there to just lay a beating on Bryan "in case" HHH lost to Punk. Just seems like they blew a lot of TV time on Bryan v The Authority to just have it pay off with absolutely nothing. Interesting how the story that actually played out led into a Bats heel turn, which led to Shield v Evolution, which led to Rollins turning heel and setting up the next 18-24 months of storylines. For on the fly that's pretty good. |
![]() |
![]() |