Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid
Thank you. That concession that there is such a thing as a silly answer -- or an unfounded opinion -- goes a long way to proving my point. There is an interpretation to the question that would disqualify certain candidates from objective consideration.
|
Why is objectivity even an issue, though? Some preferred Matt Hardy, some preferred AJ Styles. There's nothing wrong with either answer, or any other, as long as it's not just thrown out there like your Rob Van Dam "joke."
This isn't that difficult, nor is there a reason for you to get so wound up about it.