![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: 405
![]() ![]() |
IMHO a third show would have to be just for lower mid card/jobber type talent. If it weren't then the company would have to come up with a third set of championships, which would make the idea of being a champion even less important.
I have already mentioned in another post that I think there being two world titles makes it seem worthless (especially as Triple H seems glued to the World Heavyweight belt, but thats another story ...), so a third would be even worse. For a third show to work, SmackDown! and RAW (and their respective championships) should be given completely equal status, and the third, minor league type, show should be for the workers who: a) don't get much TV time b) job to the likes of Triple H, Bradshaw or Kurt Angle every time they do c) are obviously talented but haven't had the pushes they deserve (the Hurricane springs to mind here) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
I like cake
Posts: 66
![]() |
Quote:
Usually it's the Lightweights who get made a fool of Steven Richards Hurricane Simon Dean Maven Tajiri Blah blah, the list goes on and on. But a third show what be a credibility to those superstars, it'd make a change from getting kicked in the ball sack by the likes of that red head bitch. Which reminds me, why to the CW guys have to job to the new guys in the new guys first few matches? Isn't that act getting a little over used after all these men have done it) Masters Dean Kenzo Snitsky Hassan Shelton (when he got drafted) Batistia And yet the WWE still try to make the worst wrestlers alive today by beating World Class superstars. |
|
![]() |
![]() |