![]() |
|
|
#41 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Braden Walker is not an up and comer. He's up. He came. He's a star in his own right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Da Gif/Pic Pimp
Posts: 13,913
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If it could ever happen I would actually like to see a match of Punk/Kofi vs Mysterio/Bourne.
So obviously I'm for Bourne. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
You'll have to forgive me for using your past prejudices and opinions to a level of consistency. It is my mistake. Also, just so you boys know, a straw-man is an argument. I was not arguing anything. You're just being dicks for the sake of it. My statement is, at the very worst, hyperbole, and BDC's past condemnations of ROH are reason enough to explain this. Also, for the love of God, KK -- "strawmen" or "strawman" is not a fucking word! Granted, it doesn't change what you meant, but for a guy who claims to be a journalist, aspires to be a writer and constantly introduces and uses the phrase -- can't you at least get used to using it properly? It wouldn't be a big deal if it weren't so sadly ironic. And yes, I am setting you up. Last edited by Mr. Nerfect; 12-08-2008 at 05:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Smitten for Kittens
Posts: 3,814
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
RoH has ppvs, thus they are matches on screen. I have not been inconistant. Tyler Black has been denied as you are not allowed to nominate anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LOL. My argument is iron clad enough, Noid decides to attack my spelling. Even though I've explained to him before that "strawman" is acceptable as a variant spelling of "straw man."
Not only does Noid have nothing valid to refute, but even his new argument is legless. Also, Noid doesn't understand what an argument is. |
|
|
|