*Alienoid kills himself* The Official 2009 WWE Mass Release Thread

JT · 01-09-2009, 10:48 PM

I guess the real look at it is this...is the amount of money that is brought in by two seperate rosters earn enough that two seperate rosters is effecient. The points have are making more money by holding two shows, but at the same time you are also using two seperate crews.

Now I say if you cut enough people you are going to keep the people who are more interesting to see and bring a better television product each week (well, I know history says otherwise, but I'm hoping for what I said to be true). If you have a better show, then chances are they will do better than 1 of the two seperate rosters. However, you are also once again taking in effect the amount of money given out to their crew and talent.

I think in the end it's hard to decide what is best to do without all the fact. It's even hard to decide what's good as a product...remember 7 years ago we were clammering for the seperate rosters because it would help showcase wrestlers we like but didn't get airtime...and yet that didn't happen. Bringing the roster's back together might be a little more interesting at first, until wrestlers who do get showcased now (Jericho, CM Punk, Legacy, etc) get no airtime for the likes of HHH, John Cena, and Batista.

01-09-2009, 10:48 PM	#11
JT #1 Senior Elite Member Posts: 7,886	I guess the real look at it is this...is the amount of money that is brought in by two seperate rosters earn enough that two seperate rosters is effecient. The points have are making more money by holding two shows, but at the same time you are also using two seperate crews. Now I say if you cut enough people you are going to keep the people who are more interesting to see and bring a better television product each week (well, I know history says otherwise, but I'm hoping for what I said to be true). If you have a better show, then chances are they will do better than 1 of the two seperate rosters. However, you are also once again taking in effect the amount of money given out to their crew and talent. I think in the end it's hard to decide what is best to do without all the fact. It's even hard to decide what's good as a product...remember 7 years ago we were clammering for the seperate rosters because it would help showcase wrestlers we like but didn't get airtime...and yet that didn't happen. Bringing the roster's back together might be a little more interesting at first, until wrestlers who do get showcased now (Jericho, CM Punk, Legacy, etc) get no airtime for the likes of HHH, John Cena, and Batista.