TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum
Reload this Page Question: TNA VS WWE
Register Members List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2010, 02:34 PM   #1
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,625
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Steele View Post
Then he wasn't ready to be World Heavyweight Champion and the face of the company. My point is, if you want to be the World Champion and face of the company, you need to be able to do whatever is asked of you.
Should people really have expected him to be ready for that role at the time, though? He was given the ball during the "Triple H Era" on RAW (not a knock, as I love Trips). Could anyone really have been expected to come out over "that" Triple H (especially with that kind of character)?
screech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 02:37 PM   #2
James Steele
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
 
James Steele's Avatar
 
Posts: 29,886
James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by screech View Post
Should people really have expected him to be ready for that role at the time, though? He was given the ball during the "Triple H Era" on RAW (not a knock, as I love Trips). Could anyone really have been expected to come out over "that" Triple H (especially with that kind of character)?
Hmmm...they had Orton win the belt and turn babyface. As a babyface, he had a dominant heel stable going after him. He couldn't get over as a babyface even with all the sympathy in the world. Orton proved he wasn't ready to be champion, and thats why he dropped it at Unforgiven and didn't win the title again for years.
James Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 02:43 PM   #3
The Show Off
Total Non-Stop Apologist
 
The Show Off's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,430
The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Steele View Post
Hmmm...they had Orton win the belt and turn babyface. As a babyface, he had a dominant heel stable going after him. He couldn't get over as a babyface even with all the sympathy in the world. Orton proved he wasn't ready to be champion, and thats why he dropped it at Unforgiven and didn't win the title again for years.
If all that is true, which I'll agree to that to a point, then it was the WWE's failure to utalize their talent properly. If they were good at utalizing talent they would have known that Randy Orton wasn't ready to with the title and shouldn't have given him the belt.

If the WWE pushed Randy Orton to the title and he wasn't ready than the WWE failed along with Randy Orton. It's just logic.

It can't be one or the other, it has to be both.
The Show Off is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 02:48 PM   #4
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,625
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Show Off View Post
If all that is true, which I'll agree to that to a point, then it was the WWE's failure to utalize their talent properly. If they were good at utalizing talent they would have known that Randy Orton wasn't ready to with the title and shouldn't have given him the belt.

If the WWE pushed Randy Orton to the title and he wasn't ready than the WWE failed along with Randy Orton. It's just logic.

It can't be one or the other, it has to be both.
This. You can't hang failure of a character solely on the worker. WWE is as much to blame for not realizing what works with some can't work with all.
screech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 02:59 PM   #5
James Steele
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
 
James Steele's Avatar
 
Posts: 29,886
James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by screech View Post
This. You can't hang failure of a character solely on the worker. WWE is as much to blame for not realizing what works with some can't work with all.
My point is that Randy Orton has most of the blame in his failures.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Show Off View Post
That's true. The WWE for far too long have been more worried about what wrestlers do in the locker room than what they do in the ring. I totally agree with that assessment.

But if the WWE were so damn concerned with wrestlers being good "company guys" then why push a repeat flake a drug addict in Jeff Hardy to the moon?
Jeff Hardy never buried the company in public appearances such as radio interviews. Jeff Hardy was also one of the most over guys in the company at that time on a brand that needed help. The WWE does need to worry about what goes in the locker room, since you are same person who will say WWE worries too much about the locker room but will crucify WWE when a wrestler ODs or dies from his own stupidity.
James Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 03:13 PM   #6
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,625
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Steele View Post
My point is that Randy Orton has most of the blame in his failures.
Even in this example? You can't agree that WWE is just as much at fault? I understand his behavior outside the ring screwed him, and if that's what you're referring to I agree, but in this case I don't buy it.

It seems like your disdain for Orton is the driving force behind your opinion here, in which case that statement is ridiculous.
screech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 03:15 PM   #7
James Steele
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
 
James Steele's Avatar
 
Posts: 29,886
James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)James Steele makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by screech View Post
Even in this example? You can't agree that WWE is just as much at fault? I understand his behavior outside the ring screwed him, and if that's what you're referring to I agree, but in this case I don't buy it.

It seems like your disdain for Orton is the driving force behind your opinion here, in which case that statement is ridiculous.
WWE does have some blame for putting a guy who wasn't ready into that situation, but at the end of the day they put their faith in Randy Orton and Randy didn't even seem to try and make it work. I guess Randy thought his daddy and grandfather would make it work for him, just like everything else in his career.
James Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 05:22 PM   #8
The Show Off
Total Non-Stop Apologist
 
The Show Off's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,430
The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)The Show Off is good (20,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Steele View Post
My point is that Randy Orton has most of the blame in his failures.



Jeff Hardy never buried the company in public appearances such as radio interviews. Jeff Hardy was also one of the most over guys in the company at that time on a brand that needed help. The WWE does need to worry about what goes in the locker room, since you are same person who will say WWE worries too much about the locker room but will crucify WWE when a wrestler ODs or dies from his own stupidity.
I've never held the WWE accountable for wrestlers ODing. Never once. Don't put words in my mouth.
The Show Off is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.

Forums Home - TPWW - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®