![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Tîm Defaid
Posts: 6,646
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Meh, I don't see why you should make a scheduling exemption just because of a new stadium. It's going the most sensible route, a flip of a coin. Can't get much fairer than that.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
It will fuck up the two East Divisions schedules or else they lose the "division plays the same people" aspect |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
feel the madness
Posts: 11,360
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure two of the games each year are based on records or something like that. I don't think it would have been too hard to schedule. Either way I don't really care. In 20 years, is anyone going to care who had the first game in the new stadium? They shouldn't. Should Goodell have had both parties meet to discuss the plans? Maybe. Ultimately I don't think it is a big deal. |
|
|
|