![]() |
|
View Poll Results: #215 | |||
Eddie Guerrero |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
28 | 41.18% |
The Rock |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
40 | 58.82% |
Voters: 68. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: 6,350
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
...the last couple years of his career, Eddie was so stiff that I don't get how people enjoyed his wrestling...he wasn't the same.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: 195
![]() |
In all honesty, can you or anyone name a wrestler who was as good at the end of their careers as they were when they started? This is due to the effects of time in the ring and really shouldn't be used when judging the wrestler.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Posts: 6,350
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Shawn Michaels wasn't just "as good", he was BETTER when he retired than when he started.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Posts: 195
![]() |
Quote:
Was Shawn bad at the end of his career? Of course not. He was good, some would say great, but he wasn't better than he was during his peak. Also, "would my original post be any different if Eddie was alive?" Honestly, his mortality (or lack their of) didn't even come to mind. Dead or alive, I still see him as being better than The Rock. |
|
![]() |
![]() |