Wake me up when december ends

[BigCrippyZ]

Originally Posted by The CyNick Yeah but see you're falling into that tap of basically saying Vince doesn't know what is good. He managed to identify the right formula to make tons of stars over his career. The problem is not everyone is good enough to reach the top. He pushed Eddie to the top when nobody thought he would. I don't know how much that character was Vince and how much was Eddie, but he certainly became a larger than life character under Vince's watch. Punk got to do tons. He was given lots of freedom. He was just a bitch when it was time to step aside for other guys. I think he saw Bryan was gaining steam and didn't like it. So he took his ball and went home so he could pretend to be a real fighter. I think you're cherry picking stories from guys who are bitter. Why would Vince turn down a million dollar idea? There is this belief among the IWC that Vince hates success, like as though guys are feeding him money angles every night, and he goes "nahhhh let's just do something that is boring and will cost me money". Yet Vince stands to gain or lose more than anyone else in the entire world, so why would he intentionally turn down great ideas? I'm sure guys have made suggestions that Vince had turned down, but the devil is in the detail. Usually when you hear ex WWE guys talk about angles they suggested, it usually involves them at the top of the card. Maybe Vince no longer sees that guy as a top guy, or maybe he never did. Vince has to make a judgment call on how far he sees a guy going before investing resources in that angle and that star. Heath Slater could come up with a riveting storyline to get him to a Mania main event against Brock Lesnar, but if Vince only sees Heath as a comedy act, why waste time on it? Is Vince always right? Hell no. Does he have a better track record than anyone else in the world? Yup. So maybe he should get the benefit of the doubt.

I'm not saying that everyone can be a huge star or success. I'm not saying that Vince wasn't responsible for making huge stars throughout his career or isn't the most successful promoter. I'm also not saying that Vince would intentionally turn down a great million dollar idea in favor of an idea that may or may not cost him money instead. I don't think anyone here is claiming any of those things.

What I am saying is that he's CURRENTLY either out of touch, complacent, afraid to take risks creatively, or some combination of the above. His past success was great. No one's denying that.

What we are complaining about is his CURRENT ability to make FUTURE stars. Absolutely, some of that is very much out of Vince's control and instead is in the talent's hands (drive, work ethic, talent levels, etc.) With that said, all of the talent or drive in the world are useless if you have someone running the show who is out of touch, complacent or afraid to take chances on talent or ideas.

I've been waiting for 5+ years (closer to 10 years) for things to change, and no, I don't mean going back to strictly Attitude era type material. Where do you draw the line? How long do you give Vince & co. to find and develop that next crop of stars or come up with a consistent set of compelling midcard and main event storylines? I've already given up in terms of watching regularly. No more watching RAWs or PPV events regularly for me until I hear of an awesome and consistent turn around.