The thread where we get CyNick to defend maligned storylines, and tell us how we don't understand...

[KIRA]

Originally Posted by The CyNick Disagree?

Not so much with RVD with Booker YES and its not like he could not have been built up to that level he was talented and over the Triple-H stuff cut the legs out from under him (in a pretty despicable way even if it is just wrestling)

Batista is only "Above Booker's level because the company got behind him and pushed as a huge deal. Booker had it all over Batista he could talk as a heel or face (Batista only hit his stride as a heel) he was Athletic and had a nice look to him. Theres a Wrestle crap entry that talks about the HHH Booker thing way better than I can that said Booker definitely should have beaten HHH even James Steele will fully admit this.

Saying Batista has it over Booker to me is like saying Nikki Bella has it over Sasha Banks.

When the company gets behind you and wants you to be the guy you really can't lose barring a colossal fuck-up. Look at Roman he's gonna be the man whether you like it or not. Is he better than Ambrose fuck no, but he's the guy the company wants.